A randomized, controlled trial of i.v. versus i.m. ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures.

@article{Roback2006ARC,
  title={A randomized, controlled trial of i.v. versus i.m. ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures.},
  author={M. Roback and J. Wathen and T. Mackenzie and L. Bajaj},
  journal={Annals of emergency medicine},
  year={2006},
  volume={48 5},
  pages={
          605-12
        }
}
  • M. Roback, J. Wathen, +1 author L. Bajaj
  • Published 2006
  • Medicine
  • Annals of emergency medicine
  • STUDY OBJECTIVE We compare adverse events, efficacy, and length of sedation of intravenous (i.v.) versus intramuscular (i.m.) ketamine procedural sedation and analgesia for orthopedic procedures in the emergency department (ED). METHODS Pediatric patients receiving ketamine for orthopedic procedures were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a children's hospital ED. All patients were initially randomized to receive ketamine either 1 mg/kg i.v. or 4 mg/kg i.m… CONTINUE READING

    Paper Mentions

    INTERVENTIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL
    Hypothesis: A combination of midazolam with dexmedetomidine for sedation during third molar surgery will provide 1) superior patient satisfaction, 2) superior operator satisfaction and… Expand
    ConditionsAnesthesia
    InterventionDrug
    INTERVENTIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL
    The objective of this study is to compare Ketamine-Propofol with Ketamine-only in a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial in a paediatric emergency department. We believe that… Expand
    ConditionsFractures
    InterventionDrug

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 31 REFERENCES
    Intravenous ketamine sedation of pediatric patients in the emergency department.
    138