A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE)
@article{Schultz1996ARB, title={A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE)}, author={David Schultz}, journal={The Lancet}, year={1996}, volume={348}, pages={1329-1339} }
2,634 Citations
Benefit of ADP Receptor Antagonists in Atherothrombotic Patients: New Evidence
- Medicine, BiologyCerebrovascular Diseases
- 2001
A potential clinically useful advantage of clopidogrel is its low propensity for adverse interaction with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, contrary to what may be seen with aspirin, as observed in a post-hoc CAPRIE analysis.
Results of the CAPRIE trial: efficacy and safety of clopidogrel
- Medicine, BiologyVascular medicine
- 1998
Results indicate that clopidogrel is more effective and safer than aspirin in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerosis.
Clopidogrel – Confounding or Confirming Our Concept of How to Treat Acute Coronary Syndromes?
- Biology, MedicineHeart Drug
- 2002
Clinical trials generally suggest that patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease are more effectively managed with long-term clopidogrel than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death, and the combination of clopIDogrel and aspirin is safer when compared to ticlopidine and aspirin following percutaneous coronary intervention.
The value of clopidogrel versus aspirin in reducing atherothrombotic events: The CAPRIE study
- Biology, MedicinePharmacoEconomics
- 2012
The available data support the use of clopidogrel as a clinically efficient and cost-effective option for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease, particularly in high-risk patients.
Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
- MedicineThe Lancet
- 2004
Aspirin in Neurology
- Medicine, Biology
- 2011
Among more than 23000 patients, antiplatelet therapy compared with placebo or untreated control continued for a mean of 29 months was associated with a 22% reduction in the odds of recurrent ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), or vascular death.
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy (Aspirin, Clopidogrel and Dipyridamole) in the Secondary Prevention of Stroke: Safety, Tolerability and Feasibility
- Medicine, PsychologyPloS one
- 2008
Long term triple antiplatelet therapy was asociated with a significant increase in adverse events and bleeding rates, and their severity, and a trend to increased discontinuations, however, the patients had a low risk of recurrence and future trials should focus on short term therapy in high risk patients characterised by a very recent event or failure of dual antiplatelets therapy.
Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.
- Medicine, BiologyThe New England journal of medicine
- 2001
The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel has beneficial effects in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, however, the risk of major bleeding is increased among patients treated with clopIDogrel.
Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Recent Transient Ischaemic Attack or Ischaemic Stroke (MATCH): Study Design and Baseline Data
- MedicineCerebrovascular Diseases
- 2003
MATCH is a major ongoing trial that will provide important data on the benefit of clopidogrel and ASA compared with clopIDogrel alone for reduction of vascular ischaemic events in patients with recent TIA or IS who are at high risk of atherothrombotic event recurrence.
Costs and consequences of clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of ischaemic events in (high-risk) atherosclerotic patients in Sweden
- MedicineApplied health economics and health policy
- 2010
Clopidogrel appears to be associated with costs per QALY that range from intermediate in the total CAPRIE population to low in high-risk atherosclerotic patients, when considering the cost-effectiveness categorization as proposed by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.