A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision
@inproceedings{Baltag2008AQT, title={A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision}, author={Alexandru Baltag and Sonja Smets}, year={2008} }
We present a logical setting that incorporates a belief-revision mechanism within Dynamic-Epistemic logic. As the “static” basis for belief revision, we use epistemic plausibility models, together with a modal language based on two epistemic operators: a “knowledge” modality K (the standard S5, fully introspective, notion), and a “safe belief” modality □ (“weak”, non-negatively-introspective, notion, capturing a version of Lehrer’s “indefeasible knowledge”). To deal with “dynamic” belief…
334 Citations
Iterated Belief Base Revision: A Dynamic Epistemic Logic Approach
- PhilosophyAAAI
- 2019
This work investigates how priority graphs, a syntactic representation of preference relations deeply connected to prioritised bases, can be used to characterise belief change operators, focusing on well-known postulates of Iterated Belief Change.
Dynamic Logics of Belief Change
- Philosophy
- 2015
This chapter gives an overview of current dynamic logics that describe belief update and revision, both for single agents and in multi-agent settings. We employ a mixture of ideas from AGM belief…
Belief revision and dynamic logic
- Philosophy
- 2013
We explore belief change policies in a modal dynamic logic that explicitly delineates knowledge, belief, plausibility and the dynamics of these notions. Taking a Kripke semantics counterpart to Grove…
Propositional Dynamic Logic as a Logic of Knowledge Update and Belief Revision
- Philosophy
- 2008
This talk shows how propositional dynamic logic (PDL) can be interpreted as a logic for multi-agent knowledge update and belief revision, or as a logic of preference change, if the basic relations…
Chapter 7 Dynamic Logics of Belief Change
- Philosophy
- 2015
This chapter gives an overview of current dynamic logics that describe belief update and revision, both for single agents and in multi-agent settings. We employ a mixture of ideas from AGM belief…
Belief update as social choice
- Economics
- 2011
Dynamic epistemic-doxastic logics describe the new knowledge or new beliefs indexBelief of agents after some informational event has happened. Technically, this requires an update rule that turns a…
Probabilistic dynamic belief revision
- Computer Science, PhilosophySynthese
- 2008
A theory of Probabilistic dynamic belief revision is developed, introducing probabilistic “action models” and proposing a notion of probabilism update product, that comes together with appropriate reduction laws.
Multi-agent Belief Revision with Linked Plausibilities
- Philosophy, Economics
- 2010
textabstract In this paper we forge a connection between dynamic epistemic logics of
belief revision on one hand and studies of collective judgement and multi-agent
preference change on the other.…
A 2 . Philosophical Logic Higher-Order Belief Change in a Branching-Time Setting
- Philosophy
- 2011
While the standard work in logic for belief revision after [1 ] is cast in a syntactic-axiomatic and single-agent setting, recent developments in modal logic s how how a semantic approach can give…
The Logic of Justified Belief Change, Soft Evidence and Defeasible Knowledge
- PhilosophyWoLLIC
- 2012
A logic for reasoning about the evidence-based knowledge and beliefs and the evidential dynamics of non-logically -omniscient agents and a formal dynamic account of Lehrer’s well-known Gettier-type scenario involving the famous Ferrari and the infamous Messrs. Nogot and Havit is provided.
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 72 REFERENCES
Conditional Doxastic Models: A Qualitative Approach to Dynamic Belief Revision
- PhilosophyElectron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci.
- 2006
Dynamic Belief Revision over Multi-Agent Plausibility Models
- Philosophy
- 2006
In this paper, we develop a notion of doxastic actions, general enough to cover all examples of communication actions and most other belief-changing actions encountered in the literature, but also…
Probabilistic dynamic belief revision
- Computer Science, PhilosophySynthese
- 2008
A theory of Probabilistic dynamic belief revision is developed, introducing probabilistic “action models” and proposing a notion of probabilism update product, that comes together with appropriate reduction laws.
The Logic of Conditional Doxastic Actions : A theory of dynamic multi-agent belief revision
- Philosophy
- 2006
We present a logic of conditional doxastic actions, obtained by incorporating ideas from belief revision theory into the usual dynamic logic of epistemic actions. We do this by extending to actions…
Dynamic logic for belief revision
- PhilosophyJ. Appl. Non Class. Logics
- 2007
This work shows how belief revision can be treated systematically in the format of dynamicepistemic logic, when operators of conditional belief are added, and obtains complete logics for concrete mechanisms of belief revision based on compositional reduction axioms.
The Algebra of Multi-Agent Dynamic Belief Revision
- PhilosophyElectron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci.
- 2006
A Logic for Suspicious Players: Epistemic Actions and Belief-Updates in Games
- Computer Science, Philosophy
- 2000
This paper uses a logic that combines in a specific way a multi-agent epistemic logic with a dynamic logic of ``epistemic actions'' to describe changes in the information states of the players in a game.
From conditional probability to the logic of doxastic actions
- Computer Science, PhilosophyTARK '07
- 2007
A theory of probabilistic dynamic belief revision is developed, introducing "action models" and a notion of Probabilistic update product, that comes together with appropriate reduction laws.
Logics for Epistemic Programs
- Computer ScienceSynthese
- 2004
The construction of logical languages which allow one to represent a variety of possible types of changes affecting the information states of agents in a multi-agent setting by defining a notion of epistemic program, which is a Kripke model of ‘actions’, representing the agents' uncertainty about the current action in a similar way that Kripkel models are commonly used in epistemic logic.