A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability

@article{Popper1983APO,
  title={A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability},
  author={K. Popper and David Miller},
  journal={Nature},
  year={1983},
  volume={302},
  pages={687-688}
}
Proofs of the impossibility of induction have been falling ‘dead-born from the Press’ ever since the first of them (in David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature) appeared in 1739. One of us (K.P.) has been producing them for more than 50 years. The present proof strikes us both as pretty. 
The Non-existence of Probabilistic Inductive Support
Using a minimum of propositional logic and of the elementary calculus of probability (see the Appendix), David Miller and I (Popper and Miller, 1983) published a very short paper in which we provedExpand
The last word on induction?
Recent arguments of Watkins, one purporting to show the impossibility of probabilistic induction, and the other to be a solution of the practical problem of induction, are examined and two are shownExpand
The emergence of reasons conjecture
TLDR
It is shown how the maxent paradigm may be used to produce an inductive method applicable to a wide class of problems in inductive logic and a conjecture is state about the answers given by this method which extends all previous partial confirmations. Expand
ON THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF INDUCTIVE PROBABILITY
  • M. Redhead
  • Computer Science
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1985
TLDR
In this note the ratio of P{bY | h & b2) to P(bt \ ~ h &b2) is mentioned because, under convincing assumptions, this ratio, or some function of it, is the only possible explication for the weight of evidence in favour of h provided by blt given b2. Expand
A Note on Inductive Probability
Abstract Probabilistic induction allows us to conclude that the probability of a hypothesis being true increases when evidences in favor of the hypothesis occur. A claim made by Karl Popper and DavidExpand
A Suspicious Feature of the Popper/Miller Argument
  • I. Good
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
  • 1990
The form of argument used by Popper and Miller to attack the concept of probabilistic induction is applied to the slightly different situation in which some evidence undermines a hypothesis. TheExpand
There Is a Reason for Everything (Probably): On the Application of Maxent to Induction
TLDR
How the maxent paradigm may be used to produce an inductive method applicable to a wide class of problems in inductive logic, and whether the answers it gives are consistent with, or explicable by, the existence of underlying reasons for the given knowledge base. Expand
Inductive Logic Revisited
TLDR
It is shown that Carnap’s construction may be cleared from much of this criticism provided some slight alterations are accepted, and that this opinion is not definitely well-founded. Expand
About Popper-Carnap...
The paper gives a new light on the controversy between Popper and Carnap on the interpretation of probability and its use to solve the problem of induction. In his later work on probability andExpand
Bayesian Induction and Statistical Inference
For more than two thousand years the question of how to achieve valid knowledge of the world has concerned Western epistemologists. From Aristotle, in the 4th Century B.C., until the contemporaryExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...