A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.

@article{Kahneman2003APO,
  title={A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.},
  author={Daniel Kahneman},
  journal={The American psychologist},
  year={2003},
  volume={58 9},
  pages={
          697-720
        }
}
  • D. Kahneman
  • Published 1 September 2003
  • Psychology
  • The American psychologist
Early studies of intuitive judgment and decision making conducted with the late Amos Tversky are reviewed in the context of two related concepts: an analysis of accessibility, the ease with which thoughts come to mind; a distinction between effortless intuition and deliberate reasoning. Intuitive thoughts, like percepts, are highly accessible. Determinants and consequences of accessibility help explain the central results of prospect theory, framing effects, the heuristic process of attribute… 
MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE
The work cited by the Nobel committee was done jointly with the late Amos Tversky (1937‐1996) during a long and unusually close collaboration. Together, we explored the psychology of intuitive
People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
TLDR
This framework accurately predicts people's choices in variants of both the ratio-bias and ambiguity-aversion paradigms, and focuses on the relationship between the task cuing account, other decision-making models, and dual-process accounts of cognition.
Deliberation Versus Intuition: Decomposing the Role of Expertise in Judgment and Decision Making
What produces better judgments: deliberating or relying on intuition? Past research is inconclusive. We focus on the role of expertise to increase understanding of the effects of judgment mode. We
Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles.
TLDR
This work provides convergent arguments and evidence for a unified theoretical approach to both intuitive and deliberative judgments, and adumbrates a unified approach that specifies the critical dimensions on which judgmental situations may vary and the environmental conditions under which rules can be expected to be successful.
Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: The case of transitivity
TLDR
This work pitted intuition and analytical thinking against each other on tasks that were either mainly intuitive or mainly analytical, and showed higher choice consistency when thinking mode and the characteristics of the decision task were compatible.
R 1 2 A Model of Heuristic Judgment
The program of research now known as the heuristics and biases approach began with a study of the statistical intuitions of experts, who were found to be excessively confident in the replicability of
Personal preferences for rationality or intuition
We address the question whether there is a relation between a learned general preference to respond to judgment or decision situations either rationally or intuitively, and personality
Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making
We review and reconceptualize “intuition,” defining intuitions as affectively charged judgments that arise through rapid, nonconscious, and holistic associations. In doing so, we delineate intuition
Preferences Induced by Accessibility: Evidence from Priming
In one experiment, we studied risky preferences using a semantic-priming paradigm where accessibility is manipulated independently of beliefs about the frequencies of risky events. We compared the
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 178 REFERENCES
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
TLDR
In a series of experiments involving most of the classic tasks in the heuristics and biases literature, the implications of individual differences in performance for each of the four explanations of the normative/descriptive gap are examined.
Rational choice and the framing of decisions
Alternative descriptions of a decision problem often give rise to different preferences, contrary to the principle of invariance that underlines the rational theory of choice. Violations of this
Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking
Decision makers have a strong tendency to consider problems as unique. They isolate the current choice from future opportunities and neglect the statistics of the past in evaluating current plans.
On the study of statistical intuitions
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
The program of research now known as the heuristics and biases approach began with a survey of 84 participants at the 1969 meetings of the Mathematical Psychology Society and the American
A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes
The target article focuses exclusively on System 2 and on reasoning rationality: the ability to reach valid conclusions from available information, as in the Wason task. The decision-theoretic
Risk as Feelings
TLDR
It is shown that emotional reactions to risky situations often diverge from cognitive assessments of those risks, and when such divergence occurs, emotional reactions often drive behavior.
Two systems of reasoning.
THE EMPIRICAL CASE FOR TWO SYSTEMS OF REASONING The stimulation from a classic paper in the heuristics and biases tradition does not come only from the insights provided into processes of judgment
New challenges to the rationality assumption
In contrast to logical criteria of rationality, which can be assessed entirely by reference to the system of preferences, substantive criteria of rational choice refer to an independent evaluation of
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.
The psychological principles that govern the perception of decision problems and the evaluation of probabilities and outcomes produce predictable shifts of preference when the same problem is framed
...
...