A partial defense of intuition on naturalist grounds

@article{Shieber2010APD,
  title={A partial defense of intuition on naturalist grounds},
  author={Joseph Shieber},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2010},
  volume={187},
  pages={321-341}
}
The debate concerning the role of intuitions in philosophy has been characterized by a fundamental disagreement between two main camps. The first, the autonomists, hold that, due to the use in philosophical investigation of appeals to intuition, most of the central questions of philosophy can in principle be answered by philosophical investigation and argument without relying on the sciences. The second, the naturalists, deny the possibility of a priori knowledge and are skeptical of the role… CONTINUE READING

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES

Modularity in cognition: framing the debate.

  • Psychological review
  • 2006
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Moderately Massive Modularity

VIEW 18 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive

R. York Guilford Press. Samuels
  • 2000
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

The naïve physics manifesto

P J.
  • dog?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
  • 1979
VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Some problems with the naturalist account of intuitions

T. Grundmann
  • investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science,
  • 2007
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

What is Justified Belief

VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

A review of B.F. Skinner’s “Verbal Behavior

N. Press. Chomsky
  • Chomsky, N
  • 1957
VIEW 3 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Kind Concepts: Some reflections on naturalism and analysis

J. Press. Horvath
  • 2007
VIEW 1 EXCERPT