A partial consequence account of truthlikeness

  title={A partial consequence account of truthlikeness},
  author={Gustavo Cevolani and Roberto Festa},
Popper’s original definition of truthlikeness relied on a central insight: that truthlikeness combines truth and information, in the sense that a proposition is closer to the truth the more true consequences and the less false consequences it entails. As intuitively compelling as this definition may be, it is untenable, as proved long ago; still, one can arguably rely on Popper’s intuition to provide an adequate account of truthlikeness. To this aim, we mobilize some classical work on partial… Expand

Tables from this paper

Truthlikeness: old and new debates
An analysis of old and new debates about the truthlikeness ordering of conjunctive theories and a critical assessment of Oddie’s new defense of the average measure and Kuipers’ refined definition of truth approximation are given. Expand
Degrees of riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness. A neo-Popperian account applicable to probabilistic theories
A fresh look at three Popperian concepts: riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness (or verisimilitude) of scientific hypotheses or theories is taken, and the dimensions that underlie the notion of riskiness are made explicit. Expand
Probabilistic truthlikeness, content elements, and meta-inductive probability optimization
The paper starts with the distinction between conjunction-of-parts accounts and disjunction-of-possibilities accounts to truthlikeness (Sects. 1, 2). In Sect. 3, three distinctions between kinds ofExpand
Approaching Truth in Conceptual Spaces
Knowledge representation is a central issue in a number of areas, but few attempts are usually made to bridge different approaches accross different fields. As a contribution in this direction, inExpand
Introduction to the special issue “Logical perspectives on science and cognition”
This special issue of Synthese is in honor of Gerhard Schurz, our good friend and colleague, who contributed to philosophy in a multitude of novel and interesting ways. The idea to do such a specialExpand
The Costs of HARKing
Kerr ([1998]) coined the term ‘HARKing’ to refer to the practice of ‘hypothesizing after the results are known’. This questionable research practice has received increased attention in recent yearsExpand
A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Synthese, 2020–2029
Abduction [336]. Abductive [11, 124]. ability [143]. Absence [188]. absences [233]. absurdity [154]. Acceptable [18]. accepting [120]. account [81, 169, 129, 13, 196, 168]. across [35]. Action [271,Expand
Degrees of riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness
  • A neo-Popperian, Leander Vignero, Sylvia Wenmackers
  • 2021
In this paper, we take a fresh look at three Popperian concepts: riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness (or verisimilitude) of scientific hypotheses or theories. First, we make explicit theExpand


Content and Likeness Definitions of Truthlikeness
Sjoerd D. Zwart’s doctoral dissertation Approach to the Truth (1998) divides theories of truthlikeness into two rival approaches. The content definitions operate with the notions of truth value andExpand
Truthlikeness and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity
It is shown that some basic arguments concerning truth approximation through belief change are not invariant across the different truthlikeness measures proposed in the literature. Expand
On Distance from the Truth as a True Distance
False scientific theories, we imagine, can differ in their closeness to the truth. Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude ([1963], pp. 228–237) sought to explain this difference as a variationExpand
Verisimilitude and belief change for nomic conjunctive theories
This paper focuses on “nomic conjunctive theories”, i.e., theories expressed as conjunctions of logically independent statements concerning the physical or, more generally, nomic possibilities and impossibilities of the domain under inquiry. Expand
An impossibility theorem for verisimilitude
It is shown that Arrow’s well-known impossibility theorem is instrumental in bringing the ongoing discussion about verisimilitude to a more general level of abstraction, and that no qualitative unifying procedure of a functional form can simultaneously satisfy the requirements of Unanimity, Independence of irrelevant alternatives and Non-dictatorship at the level of sentence variables. Expand
Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude
A quantitative likeness-definition of verisimilitude based on relevant elements which provably agrees with the qualitative relevant content-definition on all pairs of comparable theories and how the shortcomings of Popper’s original definition can be repaired by the relevant element approach is explained. Expand
Verisimilitude and Belief Change for Conjunctive Theories
Theory change is a central concern in contemporary epistemology and philosophy of science. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between two ongoing research programs providing formalExpand
Verisimilitude: The Third Period
  • I. Niiniluoto
  • Philosophy
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1998
The modern history of verisimilitude can be divided into three periods. The first began in 1960, when Karl Popper proposed his qualitative definition of what it is for one theory to be more truthlikeExpand
From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism: On Some Relations between Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation
Foreword. 1. General Introduction: Epistemological Positions. Part I: Confirmation. 2. Confirmation by the HD-Method. 3. Quantitative Confirmation, and its Qualitative Consequences. 4. InductiveExpand
Verisimilitude and Belief Revision. With a Focus on the Relevant Element Account
The expansion or revision of false theories by true evidence does not always increase their verisimilitude. After a comparison of different notions of verisimilitude the relation betweenExpand