# A paradox from randomization-based causal inference

@article{Ding2014APF, title={A paradox from randomization-based causal inference}, author={Peng Ding}, journal={arXiv: Statistics Theory}, year={2014} }

Under the potential outcomes framework, causal effects are defined as comparisons between potential outcomes under treatment and control. To infer causal effects from randomized experiments, Neyman proposed to test the null hypothesis of zero average causal effect (Neyman's null), and Fisher proposed to test the null hypothesis of zero individual causal effect (Fisher's null). Although the subtle difference between Neyman's null and Fisher's null has caused lots of controversies and confusions…

## 63 Citations

Exploring the Role of Randomization in Causal Inference

- Mathematics
- 2015

real data examples all support this surprising phenomenon. Besides its historical and theoretical importance, this paradox also leads to useful practical implications for modern researchers. Chapter…

Stratified exact tests for the weak causal null hypothesis in randomized trials with a binary outcome

- MathematicsBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
- 2017

The stratified Fisher's exact test of Jung applies a crude estimator of the treatment effect and can be regarded as a special case of the proposed exact test.

Testing weak nulls in matched observational studies

- Mathematics, Economics
- 2019

We develop sensitivity analyses for weak nulls in matched observational studies while allowing unit-level treatment effects to vary. In contrast to randomized experiments, we show for general matched…

Randomization Tests for Weak Null Hypotheses in Randomized Experiments

- MathematicsJournal of the American Statistical Association
- 2020

Abstract The Fisher randomization test (FRT) is appropriate for any test statistic, under a sharp null hypothesis that can recover all missing potential outcomes. However, it is often sought after to…

A Potential Tale of Two-by-Two Tables From Completely Randomized Experiments

- Mathematics
- 2015

Causal inference in completely randomized treatment-control studies with binary outcomes is discussed from Fisherian, Neymanian, and Bayesian perspectives, using the potential outcomes model. A…

A randomization-based perspective of analysis of variance: a test statistic robust to treatment effect heterogeneity

- Mathematics, Psychology
- 2016

Fisher randomization tests for Neyman's null hypothesis of no average treatment effects are considered in a finite population setting associated with completely randomized experiments with more than…

Sharpening randomization-based causal inference for 22 factorial designs with binary outcomes

- MathematicsStatistical methods in medical research
- 2019

The sharp lower bound of the sampling variance of the factorial effect estimator is derived, which leads to a new variance estimator that sharpens the finite-population Neymanian causal inference.

Sharp nonparametric bounds and randomization inference for treatment effects on an ordinal outcome

- MathematicsStatistics in medicine
- 2017

A numerical method is presented to calculate the sharp nonparametric bounds within a sample, reflecting the impact of confounding, and the use of a causal parameter for an ordinal outcome, defined as the proportion that a potential outcome under one treatment condition would not be smaller than that under the other condition.

Studentized Sensitivity Analysis for the Sample Average Treatment Effect in Paired Observational Studies

- MathematicsJournal of the American Statistical Association
- 2019

Abstract A fundamental limitation of causal inference in observational studies is that perceived evidence for an effect might instead be explained by factors not accounted for in the primary…

Gaussian prepivoting for finite population causal inference

- Mathematics, Economics
- 2020

In finite population causal inference exact randomization tests can be constructed for sharp null hypotheses, hypotheses which impute the missing potential outcomes. Oftentimes inference is instead…

## References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES

A Potential Tale of Two-by-Two Tables From Completely Randomized Experiments

- Mathematics
- 2015

Causal inference in completely randomized treatment-control studies with binary outcomes is discussed from Fisherian, Neymanian, and Bayesian perspectives, using the potential outcomes model. A…

Comments on the Neyman-Fisher Controversy and Its Consequences

- Mathematics
- 2014

The Neyman-Fisher controversy considered here originated with the 1935 presentation of Jerzy Neyman's Statistical Problems in Agricultural Experimentation to the Royal Statistical Society. Neyman…

Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

- Economics, Mathematics
- 1974

A discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation is presented. The objective is to specify the benefits of randomization in estimating…

Causal inference from $2^k$ factorial designs using the potential outcomes model

- Mathematics
- 2012

A framework for causal inference from two-level factorial designs is proposed. The framework utilizes the concept of potential outcomes that lies at the center stage of causal inference and extends…

Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched‐pair design

- MathematicsStatistics in medicine
- 2008

This paper extends Neyman's analysis to randomized experiments under the matched-pair design where experimental units are paired based on their pre-treatment characteristics and the randomization of treatment is subsequently conducted within each matched pair.

Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: Reexamining Freedman's critique

- Economics
- 2012

Freedman [Adv. in Appl. Math. 40 (2008) 180-193; Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 (2008) 176-196] critiqued ordinary least squares regression adjustment of estimated treatment effects in randomized experiments,…

Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion

- Economics
- 2008

The core methods in today's econometric toolkit are linear regression for statistical control, instrumental variables methods for the analysis of natural experiments, and differences-in-differences…

Randomization Does Not Justify Logistic Regression

- Computer Science
- 2008

The logit model is often used to analyze experimental data. However, randomization does not justify the model, so the usual estimators can be inconsistent. A consistent estimator is proposed.…

Design of Observational Studies

- EconomicsSpringer Series in Statistics
- 2020

Beginnings.- Dilemmas and Craftsmanship.- Causal Inference in Randomized Experiments.- Two Simple Models for Observational Studies.- Competing Theories Structure Design.- Opportunities, Devices, and…