A new reliability parameter for automated perimetry: inconsistent responses.

Abstract

SUMMARY A proper interpretation of perimetric results first requires an adequate evaluation of patient reliability. The patient reliability parameters that are currently used require extra testing time and are based on a relatively small sample of the subject's responses. To develop a new, more robust reliability parameter, 160 visual fields of 20 eyes of… (More)

Topics

Cite this paper

@article{Lee1993ANR, title={A new reliability parameter for automated perimetry: inconsistent responses.}, author={M. Lee and Mike A. Zulauf and Jessica Caprioli}, journal={Journal of glaucoma}, year={1993}, volume={2 4}, pages={279-84} }