A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.

@article{Wilson1996ANL,
  title={A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.},
  author={Timothy D. Wilson and Christopher E. Houston and Kathy Etling and Nancy Brekke},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. General},
  year={1996},
  volume={125 4},
  pages={
          387-402
        }
}
In previous anchoring studies people were asked to consider an anchor as a possible answer to the target question or were given informative anchors. The authors predicted that basic anchoring effects can occur, whereby uninformative numerical anchors influence a judgment even when people are not asked to compare this number to the target value. Five studies supported these hypotheses: Basic anchoring occurs if people pay sufficient attention to the anchor value; knowledgeable people are less… 

Figures from this paper

The fragile basic anchoring effect

The anchoring bias, the effect of uninformative anchor numbers on judgments, is a robust finding. In experiments yielding the anchoring bias, typically participants are explicitly asked to compare

The malleability of anchoring effects.

Using a procedural priming task, judges were induced to focus on similarities versus differences during a series of anchoring tasks and the results demonstrate that the magnitude of the obtained effect critically depended on this manipulation.

Variations on anchoring: Sequential anchoring revisited

The anchoring effect, the assimilation of judgment toward a previously considered value, has been shown using various experimental paradigms. We used several variations of the sequential anchoring

Anchoring Revisited: The Role of the Comparative Question

Two studies supported the alternative explanation that people selectively access knowledge consistent with the anchor value as part of a positive test strategy and anchoring effects emerged when the answer to the comparative question was unexpected.

When knowledge matters—differential effects of available knowledge in standard and basic anchoring tasks

The present research examines whether anchoring effects—the assimilation of a numeric estimate towards a previously considered standard—depend on judges' available knowledge in the target domain.

The anchor integration model: A descriptive model of anchoring effects

Anchoring Effects: Types, Influential Factors and Intervention Measures

Anchoring effects refers to a phenomenon that an irrelative anchor biases a subsequent numerical judgment under uncertain circumstances. The influencing factors and intervention measures vary

Prime Numbers: Anchoring and its Implications for Theories of Behavior Priming

Subtle primes can influence behavior, often in ways that seem irrational. Anchoring provides a compelling illustration of this: judgments can be influenced by anchors even when the anchors are known

What Stimuli Are Necessary for Anchoring Effects to Occur?

It is found that anchoring effects did not occur when a number was presented alone or when phrases to induce semantic priming were used without presenting a number, indicating that both numerical and semanticPriming stimuli must be presented for anchoring Effects to occur.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 54 REFERENCES

The limits of anchoring.

Anchoring and adjustment is a pervasive bias in which decision makers are influenced by random or uninformative numbers or starting points. As a means of understanding this effect, we explore two

Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks

The authors describe a method for the quantitative study of anchoring effects in estimation tasks. A calibration group provides estimates of a set of uncertain quantities. Subjects in the anchored

An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions

How do we predict the preferences of other people? This article proposes an anchoring and adjustment process where we anchor on our own preferences and attempt to adjust for ways in which we are

Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast

In the present study, subjects had to generate an evaluative judgment about a target person on the basis of his behaviour that had both positive and negative implications. In a previous phase of the

Thinking the Unthinkable: The Effects of Anchoring on Likelihood Estimates of Nuclear War1

“Anchoring” results from insufficient adjustment up or down from an original— often arbitrary—starting value. Six sets of surveys were designed to assess the effects of anchoring on subjective

Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation.

  • L. L. Martin
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1986
The results suggest that a concept may be accessible to an individual and may be relevant to target information, yet not be used to encode that information, and that individuals may use the evaluative implications of their person representation as a cue in deciding which of several equally applicable, equally accessible descriptive concepts to use in interpreting information about a person.

When comparisons arise.

It is suggested that social comparisons may be relatively spontaneous, effortless, and unintentional reactions to the performances of others and that they may occur even when people consider such reactions logically inappropriate.

Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference

Previous research has shown that the trait implication of a behavior cues recall of that behavior even when subjects have no impression formation goals. This suggests that trait inferences are made
...