A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi-criteria analysis based on 'large-scale data'

@article{Zaidan2017AND,
  title={A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi-criteria analysis based on 'large-scale data'},
  author={B. B. Zaidan and A. A. Zaidan and H. Abdul Karim and N. N. Ahmad},
  journal={Softw., Pract. Exper.},
  year={2017},
  volume={47},
  pages={1365-1392}
}
Digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking are challenging tasks because of multiple evaluation and conflicting criteria. A few approaches have been presented to implement digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking frameworks. However, these approaches still possess a number of limitations, such as fixing several attributes on the account of other attributes. Well-known benchmarking approaches are limited to robust watermarking. Therefore, this paper presents a new methodology for… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 2 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS
5 Citations
75 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 75 references

233–244

  • Ozdemir MS. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Saaty TL, Computer Modelling 2003, 383–4
  • B. B. ZAIDAN ET AL. © 2016 The Authors. Software…
  • 2016
1 Excerpt

5067–5081

  • Sulong GB Seliman SB. A new fuzzy performance modeling fo Emami MS, capacity in watermarking algorithms. International Journal Information, Control 2012, B 87
  • B. B. ZAIDAN ET AL. © 2016 The Authors. Software…
  • 2016
1 Excerpt

a comparative study

  • Triantaphyllou E. Multi-criteria decision making methods
  • Interfaces (Providence) 2000; 44: 81–84. MULTI…
  • 2016

analytical study

  • GM Alam, ML Mat Kiah, +4 authors hidden high secure data
  • Scientific Research and Essays 2010; 5(21): 3254…
  • 2016

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…