A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks

@article{Amgoud2011ANA,
  title={A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks},
  author={Leila Amgoud and Srdjan Vesic},
  journal={Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence},
  year={2011},
  volume={63},
  pages={149-183}
}
Dung’s argumentation framework consists of a set of arguments and an attack relation among them. Arguments are evaluated and acceptable sets of them, called extensions, are computed using a given semantics. Each extension represents a coherent position. In the literature, several proposals have extended this framework in order to take into account the strength of arguments. The basic idea is to ignore an attack if the attacked argument is stronger than (or preferred to) its attacker. Semantics… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
30 Citations
52 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 30 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 52 references

and Ph

  • L. Amgou
  • Besnard. A formal analysis of logic-based…
  • 2010
Highly Influential
4 Excerpts

On inference from inconsistent premises

  • N. Rescher, R. Manor
  • Journal of Theory and decision, 1:179–219,
  • 1970
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Ph

  • L. Amgoud
  • Besnard, and S. Vesic. Identifying the core of…
  • 2011
1 Excerpt

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…