A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures

Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the fixation outcome of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in treating peritrochanteric fractures. Relevant randomised controlled studies were included, and the search strategy followed the requirements of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Methodological quality was assessed and data were extracted independently. Seven studies involving 1,257 fractures were included which compared the effect of the Gamma nail and DHS. The results showed a higher rate of postoperative femoral shaft fracture with the Gamma nail compared to the DHS [relative risk (RR): 7.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.83–18.70, P < 0.0001] but no statistical differences in wound infection (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.56–1.86), mortality (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81–1.24), re-operation (RR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.91–2.95) and walking independently after rehabilitation (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.60–1.33). It seemed that there were no obvious advantages of the Gamma nail over the DHS in treating peritrochanteric fractures.

DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0783-4

8 Figures and Tables

0200400200920102011201220132014201520162017
Citations per Year

749 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 749 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Liu2009AMO, title={A meta-analysis of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw in treating peritrochanteric fractures}, author={Ming Liu and Zhi-ming Yang and Fuxing Pei and Fuguo Huang and Shiqiang Chen and Zhou Xiang}, journal={International Orthopaedics}, year={2009}, volume={34}, pages={323-328} }