A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability.

@article{Dierdorff2003AMO,
  title={A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability.},
  author={E. C. Dierdorff and M. Wilson},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  year={2003},
  volume={88 4},
  pages={
          635-46
        }
}
Average levels of interrater and intrarater reliability for job analysis data were investigated using meta-analysis. Forty-six studies and 299 estimates of reliability were cumulated. Data were categorized by specificity (generalized work activity or task data), source (incumbents, analysts, or technical experts), and descriptive scale (frequency, importance, difficulty, time-spent, and the Position Analysis Questionnaire). Task data initially produced higher estimates of interrater reliability… Expand
91 Citations

Tables and Topics from this paper

Quality of the Critical Incident Technique in Practice: Interrater Reliability and Users' Acceptance under Real Conditions
  • 22
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 96 REFERENCES
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings
  • 720
  • Highly Influential
...
1
2
3
4
5
...