• DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.635
Corpus ID: 11343057

A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability.

@article{Dierdorff2003AMO,
  title={A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability.},
  author={E. C. Dierdorff and M. Wilson},
  journal={The Journal of applied psychology},
  year={2003},
  volume={88 4},
  pages={
          635-46
        }
}

• E. C. Dierdorff, M. Wilson
• Published 2003
• Psychology, Medicine
• The Journal of applied psychology

Average levels of interrater and intrarater reliability for job analysis data were investigated using meta-analysis. Forty-six studies and 299 estimates of reliability were cumulated. Data were categorized by specificity (generalized work activity or task data), source (incumbents, analysts, or technical experts), and descriptive scale (frequency, importance, difficulty, time-spent, and the Position Analysis Questionnaire). Task data initially produced higher estimates of interrater reliability… Expand

View on PubMed

home.ubalt.edu

Save to Library

Create Alert

Cite

Launch Research Feed