A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication

@article{Domnina2016AMA,
  title={A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication},
  author={T. N. Domnina},
  journal={Scientific and Technical Information Processing},
  year={2016},
  volume={43},
  pages={241-250}
}
  • T. N. Domnina
  • Published 2016
  • Computer Science
  • Scientific and Technical Information Processing
The megajournal is a new form of an academic open-access journal that is peer reviewed for scientific and methodological soundness. Thus, the perceived importance is not assessed, leaving it to the readers to decide whether an article is of interest and importance to them. After the highly successful launch of the PLOS ONE megajournal, other publishers followed this path. The current paper undertakes a review of the articles published internationally on the megajournal criteria defining its… Expand
Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 1: Motivations)
TLDR
The results suggest that the often polarized debate surrounding OAMJs is a consequence of the extent to which observers perceive publishers to be motivated by these societal or business benefits. Expand
A Quantitative Analysis on PLoS ONE Articles Published by Authors Affiliated with Korean Institutions
This research provides a quantitative analysis on research articles published in PLoS ONE, a multidisciplinary open access journal, by authors affiliated with Korean institutions. Korean authorsExpand
The diverse niches of megajournals: Specialism within generalism
TLDR
This work analyzes how megajournals (PLOS One, Scientific Reports) are represented in different fields relative to prominent generalist journals (Nature, PNAS, Science) and “quasi‐megajournals” (Nature Communications, PeerJ). Expand
Research articles on volunteering in biomedical journals: a MEDLINE-based bibliometric analysis
TLDR
Research interest in volunteering in biomedical areas has been growing in recent decades, but the total number of publications on volunteering remains relatively small. Expand
Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open‐access mega‐journal authors: Results of a large‐scale survey
TLDR
Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness‐only peer review: two‐thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Expand
megajournals : The publisher perspective ( Part 1 : Motivations )
MegaJournal: revisão de conceitos
O MegaRevista ( MegaJournal ) tem se apresentado como uma opcao de modelo de revistas cientificas em ambiente totalmente digital, com altas taxas de publicacao e avaliacao pelos pares simplificada.Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 33 REFERENCES
A survey of authors publishing in four megajournals
TLDR
Most authors appeared pleased with the experience and indicated they are likely to submit future manuscripts to the same or similar megajournal which seems to suggest these journals will continue to grow in popularity. Expand
Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: Does it make a difference?
TLDR
It is found that elite journals with very low acceptance rates have far fewer articles with no or few citations, but that the long tail of articles with two citations or less was actually bigger in a sample of selective traditional journals in comparison with megajournals. Expand
Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?
TLDR
The evolution of mega-journals since 2010 in terms of article publication rates is presented, with the fastest growth seems to have ebbed out at around 35,000 annual articles for the 14 journals combined. Expand
The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment?
  • B. Björk
  • Computer Science
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2012
TLDR
A closer look at the development of hybrid OA and discusses, from an author-centric viewpoint, the possible reasons for the lack of success of this business model. Expand
A study of open access journals using article processing charges
TLDR
This study studied the APCs charged and article volumes of journals that were listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals as charging APCs, finding that Professionally published journals had substantially higher APCs than journals published by societies, universities, or scholars/researchers. Expand
Developing an effective market for Open Access Article Processing Charges
Acknowledgements We are pleased to submit this final report for the study titled " Developing an Effective Market for Open Access Article Processing Charges " and appreciate the opportunity toExpand
The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing fourth edition
STM publishing takes place within the broader system of scholarly communication, which includes both formal and informal elements. Scholarly communication plays different roles at different stages ofExpand
Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures
TLDR
The results show statistically significant differences in acceptance rates by discipline, country affiliation of the editor, and number of reviewers per article, and negative correlations are found between acceptance rates and citation-based indicators. Expand
Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs
The development of “open” academic content has been strongly embraced and promoted by many advocates, analysts, stakeholders, and reformers in the sector of higher education and academic publishing.Expand
Universality of Citation Distributions for Academic Institutions and Journals
TLDR
This work studies the distributions of citations to publications from individual academic institutions for a single year to find this feature seems to be universal for a broad selection of institutions irrespective of the average number of citations per article. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...