A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources

@article{Spinaci2021AMO,
  title={A map of Digital Humanities research across bibliographic data sources},
  author={Gianmarco Spinaci and Giovanni Colavizza and Silvio Peroni},
  journal={Digit. Scholarsh. Humanit.},
  year={2021},
  volume={37},
  pages={1254-1268}
}
Purpose. This study presents the results of an experiment we performed to measure the coverage of Digital Humanities (DH) publications in mainstream open and proprietary bibliographic data sources, by further highlighting the relations among DH and other disciplines. Methodology. We created a list of DH journals based on manual curation and bibliometric data. We used that list to identify DH publications in the bibliographic data sources under consideration. We used the ERIH-PLUS list of… 
2 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Approaching Digital Humanities at the University: a Cultural Challenge

The University of Bologna has a long tradition in Digital Humanities, both at the level of research and teaching. In this article, we want to introduce some experiences in developing new educational

Digital topics on cultural heritage investigated: how can data-driven and data-guided methods support to identify current topics and trends in digital heritage?

In research and policies, the identification of trends as well as emerging topics and topics in decline is an important source of information for both academic and innovation management. Since at

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES

Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data

The approach that Digital Science is taking to support the scientometric community, together with the various Dimensions tools available to researchers who wish to use Dimensions data in their research at no cost are described.

Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations

This paper presents COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations, and shows the additional services that facilitate the access to and querying of these data via different access points.

Humanities Computing as Digital Humanities

This article presents an examination of how digital humanities is currently conceived and described, and examines the discursive shift from humanities computing to digital humanities. It is argue ...

The Digital Humanities Literacy Guidebook

  • 2021

COCI CSV dataset of all the citation data (v7). electronic dataset, Figshare

  • 2020

Digital humanities—A discipline in its own right? An analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape

Compared articles published over the past three decades in three established English‐language DH journals with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines—first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science.

Digital humanities as a cross‐disciplinary battleground: An examination of inscriptions in journal publications

It is found that inscriptions have been increasingly used during the past decade, and their uses are more intensive in publications led by STEM authors comparing to other domains.

The Journal Coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A Comparative Analysis

A comparative analysis of the journal coverage of the three databases (Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions), with the objective to describe, understand and visualize the differences in them, indicates that the databases have significantly different journal coverage.

Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic

A large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic highlights the importance of combining a comprehensive coverage of the scientific literature with a flexible set of filters for making selections of the literature.

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

This paper investigates 3,073,351 citations found by these six data sources to 2,515 English-language highly-cited documents published in 2006 from 252 subject categories, expanding and updating the largest previous study.