A manifesto for reproducible science

@article{Munaf2017AMF,
  title={A manifesto for reproducible science},
  author={M. Munaf{\`o} and Brian A. Nosek and D. Bishop and K. Button and C. Chambers and N. P. D. Sert and U. Simonsohn and E. Wagenmakers and Jennifer J. Ware and J. Ioannidis},
  journal={Nature Human Behaviour},
  year={2017},
  volume={1}
}
  • M. Munafò, Brian A. Nosek, +7 authors J. Ioannidis
  • Published 2017
  • Political Science
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers… CONTINUE READING
    1,142 Citations
    Research Culture and Reproducibility
    • 2
    Fostering Robust, Reliable, and Replicable Research at the Journal of Management
    Replicable Services for Reproducible Research: A Model for Academic Libraries
    • 3
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing
    • 20
    • PDF
    Opinion: Reproducibility failures are essential to scientific inquiry
    • 18
    • PDF
    Modeling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure
    • 2
    • PDF
    Openness and Reproducibility: Insights from a Model-Centric Approach.
    • 1
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 110 REFERENCES
    Scientific Utopia
    • Brian A. Nosek, J. Spies, M. Motyl
    • Psychology, Physics
    • Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
    • 2012
    • 762
    • PDF
    Promoting an open research culture
    • 927
    • PDF
    The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
    • 122
    • PDF