A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996–2011

  title={A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996–2011},
  author={Kevin W. Boyack and Richard Klavans and Aaron A. Sorensen and John P. A. Ioannidis},
  journal={European Journal of Clinical Investigation},
  pages={1339 - 1365}
We have generated a list of highly influential biomedical researchers based on Scopus citation data from the period 1996‐2011. Of the 15,153,100 author identifiers in Scopus, approximately 1% (n=149,655) have an h‐index >=20. Of those, we selected 532 authors who belonged to the 400 with highest total citation count (>=25,142 citations) and/or the 400 with highest h‐index (>=76). Of those, we selected the top‐400 living core biomedical researchers based on a normalized score combining total… 

Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines

Multiple citation indicators that address total impact, co-authorship adjustment, and author order may give a more comprehensive picture of impact, although no citation indicator, single or composite, can be expected to select all the best scientists.

Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research

The R index was used to assess which factors correlate with collaborative behavior and whether such behavior associates with scientific impact (citations and becoming a principal investigator) and the patterns and evolution of collaborative behavior across scientific disciplines.

Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research

This work aims to draw the sport and exercise medicine community’s attention to the concept of research impact, highlight existing ways of assessingResearch impact, and outline the challenges of measuring research impact.

The rise of the middle author: Investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship

It is shown that alphabetical ordering of middle authors is frequent in biomedical research, and that the prevalence of this practice is positively correlated with the number of authors in the bylines, and suggests that growth in authors’ lists are not due to an increase in secondary contributions but, rather, in equivalent increases of all types of roles and contributions.

The Hundred Most Cited Publications in Orthopaedic HIP Research - A Bibliometric Analysis

  • Sufian S. AhmadC. Albers M. Beck
  • Medicine
    Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy
  • 2016
The study provides intellectual milestones in hip research, reflecting on the qualities and characteristics of the research, and emphasising that high LOE is not a prerequisite for a high citation count.

Highly Cited Researchers 2014 and 2015: An investigation of some of the world's most influential scientific minds on the institutional and country level

For several years, Clarivate Analytics, formerly the IP & Science business of Thomson Reuters, has published a list of researchers who have published the largest number of highly cited papers in a

Estimates of the Continuously Publishing Core in the Scientific Workforce

The proportion of the scientific workforce that maintains a continuous uninterrupted stream of publications each and every year over many years is very limited, but it accounts for the lion’s share of researchers with high citation impact.

Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis

The authors' lexicographic analysis indicates that scientific abstracts are currently written with more positive and negative words, and provides an insight into the evolution of scientific writing.

Top-Cited Articles in Implant Dentistry.

Citation analysis in the field of implant dentistry reveals interesting information about the topics and trends negotiated by researchers and elucidates which characteristics are required for a paper to attain a "classic" status.



Alzheimer's disease research: scientific productivity and impact of the top 100 investigators in the field.

An initial analysis of the role of Alzheimer's disease (AD) within the neurosciences as well as a summary of the various research foci within the AD scientific community are presented and two derivatives of the H-index are proposed: the Second-Tier H- Index and the Scientific Following H- index.

Metrics associated with NIH funding: a high-level view

The US PHS is effective at funding research with a higher-than-average impact and the grant-to-article linkage data show that synergies between NIH institutes are increasing over time.

A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures

The results indicate that the notion of scientific impact is a multi-dimensional construct that can not be adequately measured by any single indicator, although some measures are more suitable than others.

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

The general tendency of the results of the empirical studies makes it clear that citing behavior is not motivated solely by the wish to acknowledge intellectual and cognitive influences of colleague scientists, since the individual studies reveal also other, in part non‐scientific, factors that play a part in the decision to cite.

Structure of the Biomedical Literature

The structure and interrelations of the biomedical journal literature are investigated as a preparatory step for studies of biomedical research activity and a hierarchical influence diagram is presented to display the influence of 42 fields within biomedicine.

Why authors think their papers are highly cited

Self-perceptions of the author perception of a highly cited work's novelty, utility, significance, and interest provide clues to the factors that lead to high citation rate, and the importance of the interaction between internal and external factors.

Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists

It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar’s research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.

The multilayered nature of reference selection

A fresh perspective on a 30-year-old problem by extending the context of the discussion about citation theories with a new perspective, that of the readers, by layers or phases, in the final choice of references, allowing for a new classification in which any paper, to date, could be included.

Counting on citations: a flawed way to measure quality

A system is introduced, which may be easily replicated, to identify the best articles published in a journal to improve the quality of scientific research.

More time for research: Fund people not projects

John P. A. Ioannidis proposes ways to save scientists from spending all their time writing grants, as well as ideas to improve the quality of research.