A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation

@article{Dietrich2008ALP,
  title={A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation},
  author={Franz Dietrich and Christian List},
  journal={Social Choice and Welfare},
  year={2008},
  volume={31},
  pages={59-78}
}
In the emerging literature on judgment (as opposed to preference) aggregation, expert rights or liberal rights have not been investigated yet. When a group forms collective beliefs, it may assign group members with expert knowledge on certain propositions the right to determine the collective judgment on those propositions; and, when a group forms collective goals or desires, it may assign members specially affected by certain propositions similar rights on those propositions. We identify a… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.

Explore Further: Topics Discussed in This Paper

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 20 references

The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal

A. K. Sen
Journal of Political Economy • 1970
View 4 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems

J. Economic Theory • 2006
View 3 Excerpts

Conversability and Collective Intention

J. Ferejohn
Paper presented at the Common Minds Conference, Australian National University, • 2003
View 3 Excerpts

Rational Aggregation. Politics

B. Chapman
Philosophy and Economics • 2002
View 2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…