A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.

@article{Crandall2003AJM,
  title={A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.},
  author={Christian S. Crandall and A. L. Eshleman},
  journal={Psychological bulletin},
  year={2003},
  volume={129 3},
  pages={
          414-46
        }
}
The authors propose a justification-suppression model (JSM), which characterizes the processes that lead to prejudice expression and the experience of one's own prejudice. They suggest that "genuine" prejudices are not directly expressed but are restrained by beliefs, values, and norms that suppress them. Prejudices are expressed when justifications (e.g., attributions, ideologies, stereotypes) release suppressed prejudices. The same process accounts for which prejudices are accepted into the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Struggle for the Nature of “Prejudice”: “Prejudice” Expression as Identity Performance

This article develops an identity performance model of prejudice that highlights the creative influence of prejudice expressions on norms and situations. Definitions of prejudice can promote social

A model for predicting prejudice and stigma expression by understanding target perceptions: The effects of visibility, politicization, responsibility, and entitativity

The study of hostile orientations toward out-groups is divided between three main domains: a) overt (explicit, old-fashioned, or hostile) prejudice, b) veiled (implicit, modern, aversive, or subtle)

The Role of Lay Perceptions of Ethnic Prejudice in the Maintenance and Perpetuation of Ethnic Bias

This article discusses the role of lay perceptions of ethnic prejudice in the maintenance and perpetuation of prejudicial attitudes. We first discuss the importance of lay beliefs about ethnic

I am not prejudiced towards ‘them’. . . I am ambivalent! The moderating roles of attitudinal basis and motivation to respond without prejudice.

According to the Justification-Suppression model of prejudice (Crandall & Eshleman, 2003), people covertly express prejudice through attitudinal ambivalence toward outgroups that is based on beliefs.

Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory

  • T. E. FordMark A Ferguson
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2004
A “prejudiced norm theory” is introduced that specifies the social-psychological processes by which exposure to disparagement humor uniquely affects tolerance of discrimination against members of groups targeted by the humor.

Putting the brakes on prejudice rebound effects: An ironic effect of disparagement humor

Two experiments tested the hypothesis that exposure to disparagement humor attenuates rebound effects of prejudice rebound, finding that Disparagement humor fosters the release rather than suppression of prejudice.

Justifying Another’s Suppressed Prejudice: Racist Speech and Freedom of Expression

Anti-Black prejudice is generally socially unacceptable to express, and people meet harsh punishments for expressing it. A common theme in the news and on social media in response to these

Attributional Beliefs About the Controllability of Stigmatized Traits: Antecedents or Justifications of Prejudice?

Correlational studies show that prejudiced people attribute stigmatized traits to controllable causes, and blame stigmatized groups for their own fate. Attribution theory argues that causal

Vicarious Justifications for Prejudice in the Application of Democratic Values

Democratic values are widely endorsed principles including commitments to protect individual freedoms. Paradoxically, the widespread normativity of these ideas can be used to justify prejudice. With
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 404 REFERENCES

An Attribution-Value Model of Prejudice: Anti-Fat Attitudes in Six Nations

The authors propose an Attribution-Value model of prejudice, which hypothesizes that people are prejudiced against groups that they feel have some negative attribute for which they are held

Implicit prejudice and stereotyping: how automatic are they? Introduction to the special section.

  • P. Devine
  • Psychology
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 2001
The articles in this issue are thought provoking and should be generative in the field's ongoing efforts to understand the role of implicit (and explicit) processes involved in prejudice and stereotyping.

Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: the struggle for internalization.

The authors reconceptualized the source of motivation to suppress prejudice in terms of identifying with new reference groups and adapting oneself to fit new norms, and found that high suppressors are strong norm followers.

Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts.

A model suggesting that prejudice-related discrepancy experiences facilitate prejudice reduction efforts is proposed and tested. Prejudice-related discrepancies concerning gays were activated among

The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model.

A causal model linking dual dimensions of personality, social world view, ideological attitudes, and intergroup attitudes is described, suggesting that dual motivational and cognitive processes may underlie 2 distinct dimensions of prejudice.

The Personality of the Stigmatizer: Cultural World View, Conventionalism, and Self-Esteem

Abstract Two studies were conducted to investigate individual differences in the rejection of stigmatized people. In Study 1, two factors predicted rejection: (1) a cynical world view, characterized

Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice.

Three experiments supported the hypothesis that people are more willing to express attitudes that could be viewed as prejudiced when their past behavior has established their credentials as

Cognitive aspects of prejudice

  • H. Tajfel
  • Psychology
    Journal of Biosocial Science
  • 1969
The aim of this paper was to stress the importance of the adaptive cognitive functioning of man in the causation of prejudice and the general approach adopted here has implications, both for social action and for research, which have not been as yet consistently and fully taken into account.

Conceptions of Racial Prejudice: Symbolic Racism Reconsidered

Research on “symbolic racism” has underscored an important paradox in racial attitudes: whites' rejection of racial injustice, in principle, has developed without diminishing resistance to the social

An Individual Difference Measure of Motivation to Control Prejudiced Reactions

The present research examines the assertion that individuals differ in the extent to which they seek to control the expression of prejudice. The authors developed the Motivation to Control Prejudiced
...