A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques

@article{Gemino2004AFF,
  title={A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques},
  author={Andrew Gemino and Yair Wand},
  journal={Requirements Engineering},
  year={2004},
  volume={9},
  pages={248-260}
}
The paper presents a framework for the empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques used in requirements engineering. The framework is based on the notion that modeling techniques should be compared via their underlying grammars. The framework identifies two types of dimensions in empirical comparisons—affecting and affected dimensions. The affecting dimensions provide guidance for task definition, independent variables and controls, while the affected dimensions define the possible… CONTINUE READING

5 Figures & Tables

Topics

Statistics

02040'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17'18
Citations per Year

322 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 322 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.