A double-blinded randomised controlled trial – do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?

  title={A double-blinded randomised controlled trial – do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures?},
  author={Joshua Agilinko and Poh Tan},
  journal={GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW},
  • J. Agilinko, Poh Tan
  • Published 15 November 2019
  • Medicine
  • GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW
Introduction: Traditionally, non-absorbable skin sutures (SS) have been utilised in the closure of the skin in large wounds. More recently, however, skin staples (SC) have been introduced with the aim of reducing closure time and infection rates. Method: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial in all patients undergoing elective open surgeries in a single unit, from May 2007 to May 2010. Data on patient demographics, type of surgery, methods of skin closure, rate of wound infection and… 

Tables from this paper

Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Staple closure was associated with a shorter surgery duration, whereas sutures appeared to provide better cosmesis and patient satisfaction, and Sutures and staples achieved a comparable incidence of dehiscence.


Skin closure after total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial of skin adhesive versus surgical staples.
A randomised controlled trial to compare the outcomes of skin adhesive and staples for skin closure in total hip replacement found Staples were quicker and easier to use thanskin adhesive and also less expensive.
Comparison of clips versus sutures in orthopaedic wound closure
The use of skin clips, using an assistant to evert the wound edges, as an efficient form of wound closure in most uncomplicated orthopaedic procedures is recommended, without complications en chirurgie orthopédique.
Two methods of skin closure in abdominal operations: A controlled clinical trial
It is concluded that skin closure with clips reduces the incidence of wound infection in patients in whom operative parietal contamination has occurred.
Comparing Wound Complication Rates following Closure of Hip Wounds with Metallic Skin Staples or Subcuticular Vicryl Suture: A Prospective Randomised Trial
Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds opened with subcuticular vicryl, while the complication rate for patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures was significantly higher than this group.
Clips versus suture technique: is there a difference?
When factoring in the increased cost incurred by using clips, as well as other intangible factors such as surgical skill acquisition, subcuticular suture closure appears to be a favourable method of wound closure in CABG patients compared with the use of skin stapling techniques.
Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Pfannenstiel skin incision closed with subcuticular closure following cesarean section result in less postoperative discomfort and are more cosmetically appealing at the six-week postoperative visit as compared to incisions closed with staples.
Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.
A disposable skin stapler and Nylon vertical mattress sutures have been used for skin closure and the only advantage of staples was speed of wound closure.
Patient satisfaction following abdominoplasty: an NHS experience.
Skin wound closure. The effect of various wound closure methods on susceptibility to infection.
A continuous subcuticular polyglycolic acid suture with buried knots protected by a paint-on plastic dressing is shown to be resistant to surface contamination with Staphylococcus aureus in mice and
Automatic disposable stapling devices for wound closure.