A double-blind test of astrology

@article{Carlson1985ADT,
  title={A double-blind test of astrology},
  author={Shawn Carlson},
  journal={Nature},
  year={1985},
  volume={318},
  pages={419-425}
}
Two double-blind tests were made of the thesis that astrological ‘natal charts’ can be used to describe accurately personality traits of test subjects. 
Support for Astrology from the Carlson Double-blind Experiment
The Carlson double-blind study, published in 1985 in Nature (one of the world’s leading scientific publications) has long been regarded as one of the most definitive indictments against astrology.Expand
Astrology and the Scientific Method
Despite the fact that virtually all scientists reject astrology as unfounded superstition, it continues to hold a powerful grip on the belief-systems of millions of people. With the advent ofExpand
Science Versus the Stars: A Double-Blind Test of the Validity of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and Computer-Generated Astrological Natal Charts
TLDR
The authors asked 52 college students to identify their personality summaries by using a computer-generated astrological natal chart when presented with 1 true summary and 1 bogus one, and observed a P. T. Barnum effect in the accuracy ratings of both psychological andAstrological measures. Expand
Why Astrology Doesn't Work
The survival and longevity of astrology has been dependent on an astrological community that will, under no circumstances, allow it to fail. Consequently, a large array of ad hoc hypotheses (escapeExpand
Appraisal of Shawn Carlson’s Renowned Astrology Tests
Shawn Carlson’s 1985 study, published in Nature, which ended with a devastating verdict of astrology, is scrutinized.  The design of Carlson’s study violated the demands of fairness and its mode ofExpand
A Scientific Inquiry Into the Validity of Astrology
Six expert astrologers independently attempted to match 23 astrological birth charts to the corresponding case files of 4 male and 19 female volunteers. Case files contained information on theExpand
The Future of US–China Relations: A Scientific Investigation
In earlier centuries kings and governments employed astrologists to help them take the best decisions. Present-day governments no longer employ astrologists but still have no clear analytical tool ...
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
A review is presented of the book “Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment,” edited by Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman.
A quantitative examination of ostensibly extrasensory experiences occurring spontaneously and in laboratory conditions
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced orExpand
Four Examples of Pseudoscience
A relevant issue in the philosophy of science is the demarcation problem: how to distinguish science from nonscience, and, more specifically, science from pseudoscience. Sometimes, the demarcationExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
The astrological "theory" of personality: an unbiased test by a biased observer.
TLDR
The overall pattern of results was interpreted as showing no meaningful relationships between sun sign and scores on Communality, Socialization, and Flexibility, and all of the test statistics employed indicated a powerful effect on the Femininity scale. Expand
Advances in Psychological Assessment
Introduction P. McReynolds, J.C. Rosen. Metaphors of Mind Underlying the Testing of Intelligence R.J. Sternberg. The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Combining Data from Different Types ofExpand