A defence of the theoretical relevance of the term 'concept'

@inproceedings{Pino2016ADO,
  title={A defence of the theoretical relevance of the term 'concept'},
  author={Bernardo Pino},
  year={2016}
}

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 115 REFERENCES

Doing without concepts

VIEW 13 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Why Isn't Stich an ElimiNativist?

VIEW 19 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

The Big Book of Concepts

VIEW 21 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Natural Kinds, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition)

A. Bird, E. Tobin
  • Retrieved May 16,
  • 2015
VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Concepts Are Not a Natural Kind

VIEW 10 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Natural kinds and conceptual change

VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Concepts and Cognitive Science

VIEW 22 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds

Richard Boyd
  • 1991
VIEW 5 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

The role of theories in conceptual coherence.

  • Psychological review
  • 1985
VIEW 8 EXCERPTS
HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…