A counterexample to the birational Torelli problem for Calabi-Yau threefolds

@article{Ottem2018ACT,
  title={A counterexample to the birational Torelli problem for Calabi-Yau threefolds},
  author={J. C. Ottem and J{\o}rgen Vold Rennemo},
  journal={J. Lond. Math. Soc.},
  year={2018},
  volume={97},
  pages={427-440}
}
  • J. C. Ottem, Jørgen Vold Rennemo
  • Published 2018
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • J. Lond. Math. Soc.
  • The Grassmannian Gr(2, 5) is embedded in P via the Plücker embedding. The intersection of two general PGL(10)-translates of Gr(2, 5) is a Calabi–Yau 3-fold X, and the intersection of the projective duals of the two translates is another Calabi–Yau 3-fold Y , deformation equivalent to X. Applying results of Kuznetsov and Jiang–Leung–Xie shows that X and Y are derived equivalent, which by a result of Addington implies that their third cohomology groups are isomorphic as polarised Hodge structures… CONTINUE READING
    12 Citations

    Topics from this paper.

    Calabi-Yau fibrations, simple K-equivalence and mutations
    Double spinor Calabi-Yau varieties
    • 15
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Mukai duality and roofs of projective bundles
    • 1
    • PDF
    Torelli problem for Calabi-Yau threefolds with GLSM description
    • 11
    • PDF
    GLSM realizations of maps and intersections of Grassmannians and Pfaffians
    • 12
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Equivalence of K3 surfaces from Verra threefolds
    • 5
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
    Intersections of two Grassmannians in $\mathbf{P}^9$
    • 15
    • PDF
    CALABI–YAU THREEFOLDS WITH A CURVE OF SINGULARITIES AND COUNTEREXAMPLES TO THE TORELLI PROBLEM
    • 22
    • PDF
    Pfaffian Calabi-Yau Threefolds and Mirror Symmetry
    • 32
    • PDF
    A counterexample of the birational Torelli problem via Fourier–Mukai transforms
    • 7
    • PDF
    Calabi–Yau Threefolds and Moduli of Abelian Surfaces I
    • 75
    • PDF
    Double quintic symmetroids, Reye congruences, and their derived equivalence
    • 29
    • PDF