A cost-effectiveness analysis of retropubic midurethral sling versus transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence.

@article{Seklehner2014ACA,
  title={A cost-effectiveness analysis of retropubic midurethral sling versus transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence.},
  author={Stephan Seklehner and Melissa A. Laudano and Alexis E. Te and Steven A Kaplan and Bilal Chughtai and Richard Lee},
  journal={Neurourology and urodynamics},
  year={2014},
  volume={33 8},
  pages={
          1186-92
        }
}
AIMS To compare the cost-effectiveness (CE) of retropubic midurethral sling (RMS) versus transobturator midurethral sling (TMS) for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS A Markov chain decision model was created to simulate treatment of SUI with RMS versus TMS. Costing data were obtained from the Medicare RBRVS. Data regarding the efficacy and complications associated with RMS versus TMS was compiled from a literature review of 21 randomized RCTs with a minimum of… CONTINUE READING
2
Twitter Mentions

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

Repeat midurethral sling for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence

JF Hermieu, A Boyd
  • Int Urogynecol J
  • 2012

Trends in the surgicalmanagement of stress urinary incontinence

Jonsson FunkM, PJ Levin, JM Wu
  • Obstet Gynecol
  • 2012