A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia

@inproceedings{Adler2007ACR,
  title={A content-driven reputation system for the wikipedia},
  author={B. Thomas Adler and Luca de Alfaro},
  booktitle={WWW '07},
  year={2007}
}
We present a content-driven reputation system for Wikipedia authors. In our system, authors gain reputation when the edits they perform to Wikipedia articles are preserved by subsequent authors, and they lose reputation when their edits are rolled back or undone in short order. Thus, author reputation is computed solely on the basis of content evolution; user-to-user comments or ratings are not used. The author reputation we compute could be used to flag new contributions from low-reputation… 
Robust content-driven reputation
TLDR
This work presents an algorithm for content-driven reputation that prevents a set of identities from increasing their maximum reputation without doing any useful work, and proves a truthfullness result for the resulting system, stating that users who wish to perform a contribution do not gain by employing complex contribution schemes.
Content-Driven Reputation for Collaborative Systems
TLDR
It is shown that content-driven reputation systems can be obtained by embedding the document versions in a metric space with a pseudometric that is both effort preserving simple changes lead to close versions and outcome preserving versions that users perceive as similar are close.
Rating the raters: a reputation system for wiki-like domains
TLDR
Simulations were performed to verify the algorithm's potential in measuring the credibility of ratings made by various raters and show that only 1 out of 4 raters is needed to be a good rater in order to make the algorithm effective.
User contribution and trust in Wikipedia
TLDR
An empirical study of user contributions to Wikipedia is presented, showing that regardless of a user s' attribution, registered or anonymous, high reputation users are the dominant contributors that actively edit Wikipedia articles in order to remove vandalism or poor quality content.
Automatic Reputation Assessment in Wikipedia
TLDR
This paper compares and assess seven metrics for automatic reputation assessment, both originated from the literature and new suggestions, and combines these metrics via a discriminant analysis to deduce a significant reputation function.
Good Articles ?-How Wikis Work
Wikis are websites to develop content collaboratively. The question arises to what extent the reputation of participants influences the quality of wiki sites. We analyze the impact of author
Good Authors = Good Articles? - How Wikis Work
TLDR
The study shows that the experience of authors in the development of high-quality articles is highly relevant whereas the number of edits and the quality of contributions are of lower importance.
Reengineering the Wikipedia for Reputation
TLDR
A recommendation system is proposed, which allows Wikipedia users to calculate a personalised rating for any article based on feedback (recommendations) provided by other Wikipedia users, which is based on a general architecture, which it is believed applies to many existing applications for online collaboration.
Assigning trust to Wikipedia content
TLDR
A system that computes quantitative values of trust for the text in Wikipedia articles; these trust values provide an indication of text reliability, and it is shown that text labeled as low-trust has a significantly higher probability of being edited in the future than text labeling as high-trust.
Modeling user reputation in wikis
TLDR
This work parse and mine the entire English Wikipedia history pages in order to extract detailed user edit patterns and statistics and derive three computational models of a user’s reputation, which are validated using ground–truth Wikipedia data associated with vandals and administrators.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Investigations into Trust for Collaborative Information Repositories: A Wikipedia Case Study
TLDR
This paper describes the initial investigations into designing and implementing an extensible trust management layer for collaborative and/or aggregated repositories of information, and presents a trust computation algorithm with experimental results.
Computing trust from revision history
TLDR
This paper explores ways of utilizing the revision history of an article to assess the trustworthiness of the article and uses this revision history-based trust model to assess a chain of successive versions of articles in Wikipedia and evaluated the assessments produced by the model.
The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks
TLDR
An algorithm to decrease the number of downloads of inauthentic files in a peer-to-peer file-sharing network that assigns each peer a unique global trust value, based on the peer's history of uploads is described.
The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Reputation Systems
Online reputation mechanisms are emerging as a promising alternative to more traditional trust building mechanisms, such as branding and formal contracting, in settings where the latter may be
Computing and Applying Trust in Web-based Social Networks
TLDR
It is shown that, in the case where the user's opinion is divergent from the average, the trust-based recommended ratings are more accurate than several other common collaborative filtering techniques.
Propagation of trust and distrust
TLDR
It is shown that a small number of expressed trusts/distrust per individual allows us to predict trust between any two people in the system with high accuracy.
Reputation systems
Systems T he Internet offers vast new opportunities to interact with total strangers. These interactions can be fun, informative, even profitable. But they also involve risk. Is the advice of a
Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions
This paper presents an exploratory analysis of the determinants of prices in online auctions for collectible United States one-cent coins at the eBay web site. Starting with an initial data set of
The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms
TLDR
This paper discusses some important dimensions in which Internet-based feedback mechanisms differ from traditional word-of-mouth networks and surveys the most important issues related to their design, evaluation, and use.
Puppy smoothies: Improving the reliability of open, collaborative wikis
TLDR
This paper provides a practical proposal for improving user confidence in wiki information by coloring the text of a wiki article based on the venerability of the text on the philosophy that bad information is less likely to survive a collaborative editing process over large numbers of edits.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...