A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis

  title={A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis},
  author={Sarah E. Brockwell and Ian R. Gordon},
  journal={Statistics in Medicine},
Meta‐analysis may be used to estimate an overall effect across a number of similar studies. A number of statistical techniques are currently used to combine individual study results. The simplest of these is based on a fixed effects model, which assumes the true effect is the same for all studies. A random effects model, however, allows the true effect to vary across studies, with the mean true effect the parameter of interest. We consider three methods currently used for estimation within the… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random‐effects meta‐analysis

This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of available methods for calculating point estimates, confidence intervals, and prediction intervals for the overall effect size under the random‐effects model, and indicates whether some methods are preferable than others by considering the results of comparative simulation and real‐life data studies.

Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study

The performance of the fixed-effects approach and seven frequentist RE MA methods are discussed, including DerSimonian–Laird, Q-based, maximum likelihood, profile likelihood, Biggerstaff–Tweedie, Sidik–Jonkman and Follmann–Proschan.

On random-effects meta-analysis.

The asymptotic properties of the meta-analysis estimator and the joint maximum likelihood estimator when the number of studies is either fixed or increases at a slower rate than the study sizes are established and a surprising result is discovered: the former estimator is always at least as efficient as the latter.

Meta-analysis without study-specific variance information: Heterogeneity case

The main objective of this paper is to estimate the overall mean difference and associated variances, the between-study variance and the within- study variance, as specified as the important elements in the random effects model.

Random-effects meta-analysis: the number of studies matters

The overall recommendation is to avoid the DerSimonian and Laird method when the number of meta-analysis studies is modest and prefer a more comprehensive procedure that compares alternative inferential approaches.

Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta‐analysis

A novel method for constructing confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in the effect sizes is proposed that guarantees nominal coverage probabilities even in small samples when model assumptions are satisfied and yields the most accurate coverage probabilities under conditions more analogous to practice.

Testing homogeneity of effect sizes in pooling 2x2 contingency tables from multiple studies: a comparison of methods

Abstract Meta-analysis is a statistical methodology that combines the outcomes of several independent studies. Either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model is used to combine the results of the

Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Inconsistent Effects: A Time for Change

The decision to calculate a summary estimate in a meta-analysis should be based on clinical judgment, the number of studies, and the degree of variation among studies, as well as on a random-effects model that incorporates study-to-study variability beyond what would be expected by chance.

A note on the graphical presentation of prediction intervals in random-effects meta-analyses

A new graphical presentation of the PI is proposed; in this method, the summary statistics in forest plots of RE meta-analyses include an additional row, ‘95% prediction interval’, and the PI itself is presented in the form of a rectangle below the usual diamond illustrating the estimated average effect and its CI.



Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis.

A simple form for the variance of Cochran's homogeneity statistic Q is developed, leading to interval estimation of tau 2 utilizing an approximating distribution for Q; this enables the point estimation of DerSimonian and Laird to be extended.

Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

It is concluded that the test of heterogeneity should not be the sole determinant of model choice in meta-analysis, and inspection of relevant normal plots, as well as clinical insight, may be more relevant to both the investigation and modelling of heterogeneity.

A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.

It is concluded that likelihood based methods are preferred to the standard method in undertaking random effects meta-analysis when the value of sigma B2 has an important effect on the overall estimated treatment effect.

The bias of the commonly-used estimate of variance in meta-analysis

The authors discuss the bias of the estimate of the variance of the overall effect synthesized from individual studies by using the variance weighted method. This bias is proven to be negative.

An overview of statistical issues and methods of meta-analysis.

This paper discusses issues that frequently arise in meta-analysis and gives an overview of the methods used, with particular attention to the use of fixed- and random-effects approaches.

Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies

This article presents a review of the book “Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies,” by John E. Hunter, Frank L. Schmidt, and Gregg B. Jackson.

Aspirin after myocardial infarction

Dr Pollard fails to mention the element of euthanasia that death should be "gentle", and argues that if euthanasia were to be legalized, it would be an exception to the more general principle that consent of the victim rarely is a defence to a criminal charge.

Elementary Mathematical Statistics

  • K. M.
  • Mathematics
  • 1939
BOOKS concerned with statistics fall roughly into two classes, those which aim at providing a variety of methods for the analysis of data without making any serious attempt to prove the formulae

Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research

Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments