A comparison between wolves, Canis lupus, and dogs, Canis familiaris, in showing behaviour towards humans

  title={A comparison between wolves, Canis lupus, and dogs, Canis familiaris, in showing behaviour towards humans},
  author={Marianne T E Heberlein and Dennis C Turner and Friederike Range and Zsofia Viranyi},
  journal={Animal Behaviour},
  pages={59 - 66}

Figures from this paper

Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) differ in following human gaze into distant space but respond similar to their packmates' gaze.

It is suggested that comparing dogs to other animal species might be more informative when done in intraspecific social contexts, because following human gaze in dogs might be influenced by special evolutionary as well as developmental adaptations to interactions with humans.

Comparing pet and detection dogs (Canis familiaris) on two aspects of social cognition.

Pet dogs and detection dogs did not differ in their ability to follow human signals, but pets were less responsive to signals given by a stranger than by their owner, and dogs exhibited more human-directed gazing in the unsolvable task.

Testing coyotes in an object choice task following a human gesture

The preliminary results from this study suggest that most coyotes will not respond to human gestures and early life experience does not appear to improve adult performance, in contrast to most studies of gesture studies of canids.

Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans

It is proposed that during the course of domestication, dogs were selected for increased submissive inclinations in order to minimize conflicts over resources, to ensure safe co-habitation and co-working in a way that humans lead and dogs follow.

The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion

The findings support the idea that domestication has affected dogs’ behavior in terms of their overall interest in being in proximity with a human partner also in case of dogs with a relatively sparse socialization experience (free-ranging dogs), but it remains unclear what the driving motivation to interact with the human may be.

Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation

Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form reputations of individuals by directly

The role of domestication and experience in ‘looking back’ towards humans in an unsolvable task

Results suggest that basic wolf-dog differences in motivation and exploration may override differences in human-directed behaviour when animals are equally socialized, and that once the human is considered a social partner, looking behaviour occurs easily.

Deceptive-like behaviour in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Results show that dogs distinguished between the cooperative and the competitive partner, and indicate the flexibility of dogs to adjust their behaviour and that they are able to use tactical deception.

Wolf-like or dog-like? A comparison of gazing behaviour across three dog breeds tested in their familiar environments

A breed more similar to ancient breeds (more wolf-like due to a less-intense artificial selection) and not very human-oriented is produced by CWDs, while GSDs' behaviour is clarified to better understand the genetic role of this breed.



Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris)

Wolves can reach the level of dogs in their success of following momentary distal pointing in parallel with improving their readiness to form eye-contact with a human experimenter during several months of formal training.

Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs

Dogs but also wolves can use information provided by both human and conspecific demonstrators in a local enhancement task, and it is suggested that a more fine-scale analysis of dog and wolf social learning is needed to determine the effects of domestication.

Development of Gaze Following Abilities in Wolves (Canis Lupus)

It is demonstrated that following another individuals' gaze around a barrier is not restricted to primates and corvids but is also present in canines, with remarkable between-group similarities in the ontogeny of this behaviour.

A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans.

The results suggest that individual familiarization with pointing gestures ensures high-level performance in the presence of such gestures; however, species-specific differences could cause differences in signaling toward the human.

Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs

It is suggested that the phenomenon of dogs responding to cues given by humans is better analysed as a case of interspecific communication than in terms of discrimination learning.

Explaining Dog Wolf Differences in Utilizing Human Pointing Gestures: Selection for Synergistic Shifts in the Development of Some Social Skills

Evidence is provided for the first time that socialised adult wolves are as successful in relying on distal momentary pointing as adult pet dogs, however, the delayed emergence of utilising human distal Momentary pointing in wolves shows that these wild canines react to a lesser degree to intensive socialisation in contrast to dogs, which are able to control agonistic behaviours and inhibition of actions in a food related task early in development.

Dogs’ attention towards humans depends on their relationship, not only on social familiarity

Investigation of how long dogs would attend to the actions of two familiar humans and one unfamiliar experimenter while varying whether dogs had a close relationship with only one or both familiar humans provides evidence that social familiarity cannot account for dogs’ increased attention towards their owners.