A cognitive theory of pretense

  title={A cognitive theory of pretense},
  author={Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich},

Figures from this paper

Pretense and Cognitive Architecture

Herein I sketch out the foundations of a computational theory of pretense, where pretense is broadly defined as pretend-play. In keeping with the sizable literature on the topic, I assume that

Pretense, imagination, and belief: the Single Attitude theory

A popular view has it that the mental representations underlying human pretense are not beliefs, but are “belief-like” in important ways. This view typically posits a distinctive cognitive attitude

Why pretense poses a problem for 4E cognition (and how to move forward)

Whether a person is pretending, or not, is a function of their beliefs and intentions. This poses a challenge to 4E accounts of pretense, which typically seek to exclude such cognitive states from

The Development of Representations of Pretend Object Substitutions

This research is the first to explore how children and adults mentally process simple pretend actions, specifically pretend object substitutions, and whether this representation changes with age, and suggests that preschoolers inhibit reality when representing a pretend action, older children activate an object's real and pretend identities equally, and adults activate the object'sreal identity more than the pretend one.

The Development of Representations of Pretend Object Substitutions.

ABSTRACTMany theories of how pretense is mentally represented have been posited, but none have been effectually empirically tested to date. This research is the first to explore how children and

Pretense: the context of possibilities

In this paper, we deal with the issue of how it is possible for pretending children to engage in exploratory performances and entertain alternative states of affairs. We question the approach

The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not ‘behaving-as-if’

An Analogical Model of Pretense

A model of pretense via analogical abduction is proposed that suggests that pretense occurs via structural alignment, and can explain results from two empirical studies, including failures in pretense.

Pretend Play as Twin Earth: A Social-Cognitive Analysis☆

Abstract Pretend play appears to be important to a theory of mind, but exactly how or why has been controversial. One widely entertained hypothesis about why pretense is important to understanding



Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind."

One of the major developments of the second year of human life is the emergence of the ability to pretend. A child's knowledge of a real situation is apparently contradicted and distorted by

Young children's conceptualization of pretense: action or mental representational state?

The results suggest that 4-year-olds do not understand that pretending requires mental representation, and appear to misconstrue pretense as its common external manifestations, such as actions, until at least the sixth year.

Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM

Preschoolers' attributions of mental states in pretense.

The view that children initially learn to recognize pretense from contextual cues and are able to infer pretenders' beliefs only with further development of metarepresentational ability is supported.

Understanding the Representational Mind

A model of writing in cognitive development, Understanding the Representational Mind synthesizes the burgeoning literature on the child's theory of mind to provide an integrated account of children's

Body or mind: children's categorizing of pretense.

Investigating whether children think of pretending as a mental state at all, by looking at whether they cluster it with other mental states or with physical processes when making certain judgments suggests most children under 6 years of age see pretending as primarily physical.

The psychology of folk psychology

  • A. Goldman
  • Psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1993
Abstract Folk psychology, the naive understanding of mental state concepts, requires a model of how people ascribe mental states to themselves. Competent speakers associate a distinctive memory

How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality

  • A. Gopnik
  • Psychology, Philosophy
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1993
Abstract As adults we believe that our knowledge of our own psychological states is substantially different from our knowledge of the psychological states of others: First-person knowledge comes

Theories of theories of mind: Simulation-theory, theory-theory, and the evidence from autism

I want to compare two explanations of autism. Both these explanations are suggested by the apparent fact that people with autism have difficulty in understanding the mental states of others, though

Pretense: The form and function of make-believe play☆