A cliometric counterfactual: what if there had been neither Fogel nor North?

  title={A cliometric counterfactual: what if there had been neither Fogel nor North?},
  author={Claude Diebolt and Michael J. Haupert},
Abstract1993 Nobel laureates Robert Fogel and Douglass North were pioneers in the “new” economic history, or cliometrics. Their impact on the economic history discipline is great, though not without its critics. In this essay, we use both the “old” narrative form of economic history, and the “new” cliometric form to analyze the impact each had on the evolution of economic history. 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Mixing history of economic thought with cliometrics: room for debates on economic growth
Cliometrics has been defined and summarized in numerous scholarly articles. They all pretty much start with the obvious, that cliometrics is the application of economic theory and quantitative
Getting over naïve scientism c. 1950: what Fogel and North got wrong
Fogel and North, both of them old radicals in the 1950s, received the Nobel Memorial Prize in 1993 for their advocacy—and practice—during the 1960s and 1970s of quantitative methods and especially of
The long-term evolution of economic history: evidence from the top five field journals (1927–2017)
The growing appeal of the long-run perspective among economists and the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of the Conrad and Meyer article (1958), which marked the official beginning of the
Douglass North as a Political Economist
This article explores Douglass North’s intellectual development as a political economist and an interdisciplinary researcher. Although he was an important figure during the cliometrics revolution, he
The Past’s Long Shadow. A Systematic Review and Network Analysis of Cliometrics or the New Economic History
During the interwar years, Japanese industrialisation accelerated alongside the expansion of industrial exports to regional markets. Trade blocs in the interwar years were used as an instrument of
History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future
Contemporaries tend to question certain belief systems including academic systems of knowledge. Paradigms evolve to become a subject of inquiry. The need to acknowledge history of economic thought as
Ninety years of publications in Economic History: evidence from the top five field journals (1927-2017)
The growing appeal of the long run perspective among economists and the fiftieth anniversary of the of the publication of the Conrad and Meyer article (1958), which signed the Cliometric Revolution,
Economic history goes digital: topic modeling the Journal of Economic History
Digitization and computer science have established a completely new set of methods with which to analyze large collections of texts. One of these methods is particularly promising for economic
History of the institutionalist paradigm: main stages and characteristics
  • O. Salovskyi
  • Economics
    Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni
  • 2019
The article deals with a retrospective and prospective analysis of the economic thought development within the institutionalist approach. The purpose of the research is to conduct a theoretical and
O desenvolvimento da economia política de Douglass North
Este artigo explora o desenvolvimento intelectual de Douglass North como um economista politico e um pesquisador interdisciplinar. Apesar de ele ter sido uma figura importante durante o auge da Nova


Cliometrics and the Nobel
In October 1993, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics to Robert William Fogel and Douglass Cecil North `for having renewed research in economic history.' The
The Cliometric Voice
This contribution shows that the same kind of debate regarding the link between history and contemporaneous economics sparks off in quantitative history. Indeed, Cliometrics can be seen a way of
Cliometrica after 10 years: definition and principles of cliometric research
‘‘[...] cliometricians have been explaining to their colleagues in history the wonderful usefulness of economics. It is time they began explaining to their colleagues in economics the wonderful
Railroads, American Growth, and the New Economic History: A Critique
Robert Fogel and Albert Fishlow have attempted in recent studies to measure the net contribution of the railroad to American economic growth in two specific years: 1890 and 1859. Both their methods
A Quantitative History of the Journal of Economc History and the Cliometric Revolution
What do economic historians do? I analyze quantitatively The Journal of Economic History's contents since its founding, showing subfields, nations, and periods studied, and which scholars and
Economic History, Old and New
tion. Application of highly developed economic theory to the quantitative record of history opened exciting intellectual vistas to some young economists. Imbued with the spirit of pioneers, they
Clio’s Contributions to Economics and History
Economic history is a subset of history. Both economists and historians are trying to tell plausible stories about the past, and they succeed or fail by narrative standards to connect one event to
The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History
The Poverty of Clio challenges the hold that cliometrics--an approach to economic history that employs the analytical tools of economists--has exerted on the study of our economic past. In this
Reflections on the cliometrics revolution : conversations with economic historians
Introduction: Economic History and Cliometrics 1. Anglo-American Economic History to World War II 2. Before the New Economic History 3. New Economic History in North America 4. Historical Economics
Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History by Robert William Fogel, and: Burlington Route: A History of the Burlington Lines by Richard C. Overton (review)
particularly in the footnotes. It shows no awareness of the subfiety of many issues, particularly during the negotiations at Ghent, and almost otally ignores political considerations which were so