A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality.


The use of pay for performance (P4P) and public reporting of performance (PR) in health care is increasing rapidly worldwide. The rationale for P4P and PR comes from experience in other industries and from theories about incentive use from psychology, economics, and organizational behavior. This paper reviews the major themes from this prior research and considers how they might be applied to health care. The resulting conceptual model addresses the dual nature (combining direct financial and reputational incentives) of the initiatives many policymakers are pursuing. It also includes explicit recognition of the key contextual factors (at the levels of the markets and the provider organization) and provider and patient characteristics that can enhance or mitigate response to incentives. Evaluation of the existing literature (through June 2005) about incentive use in health care in light of the conceptual model highlights important weaknesses in the way that trials have been reported to date and suggests future research topics.

Citations per Year

145 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 145 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Frlich2007ABM, title={A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality.}, author={Anne Fr\olich and Jason A Talavera and Peter Broadhead and R. Adams Dudley}, journal={Health policy}, year={2007}, volume={80 1}, pages={179-93} }