Corpus ID: 231590948

A Theory of Philosophical Arguments

@inproceedings{Lumer2020ATO,
  title={A Theory of Philosophical Arguments},
  author={Christoph Lumer},
  year={2020}
}
In this article, a new, idealizing-hermeneutic methodological approach to developing a theory of philosophical arguments is presented and carried out. The basis for this is a theory of ideal philosophical theory types developed from the analysis of historical examples. According to this theory, the following ideal types of theory exist in philosophy: 1. descriptive-nomological, 2. idealizing-hermeneutic, 3. technical-constructive, 4. ontic-practical. These types of theories are characterized in… Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 59 REFERENCES
The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument: a theory that regards providingjustified belief as the principal aim of argumentation, and defends it instrumentalistically. AfterExpand
Argument schemes—an epistemological approach
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epis- temological approach to argumentation. This approach has provided strict rules for several kinds of argu-Expand
Interpreting Arguments
The aim of this paper is to develop and justify a specific methodology of interpreting arguments for judging their argumentative validity and adequacy, i.e. the aim is to provide a useful tool whichExpand
What is Justified Belief
The aim of this paper is to sketch a theory of justified belief. What I have in mind is an explanatory theory, one that explains in a general way why certain beliefs are counted as justified andExpand
Practical Arguments for Theoretical Theses
Pascal‘s wager is expounded as a paradigm case of a practical,decision-theoretical argument for acting as if a proposition is true when wehave no theoretical reasons to accept or reject itExpand
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons
The article develops and justifies, on the basis of epistemological argumentation theory, two central pieces of the theory of evaluative argumentation interpretation: 1. criteria for recognizingExpand
What is the Argument? An Introduction to Philosophical Argument and Analysis MARALEE HARRELL Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. xiv + 463 pp. $58.00 (paper)
This is a textbook for the whole or a significant part of a particular kind of philosophy course. It’s for a course that has as a main goal learning how to do the exegetical task of analyzing orExpand
The Theory of Justice
Moral and value judgments are viewed by many people as at base subjective, nonrational, and incapable of proof. In academic moral philosophy this view is reflected in the dominance in much of thisExpand
A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies
  • L. Nelson
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Argumentation Library
  • 2016
TLDR
A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies began as a series of lectures, delivered from April to July 1921 under the title ’Typische Denkfehler in der Philosophie’, or ‘Typical Errors of Thinking in Philosophy’; the volume under review is an English translation of that edition by Fernando Leal and David Carus with an introduction and annotations by Leal. Expand
Bayesian epistemology
‘Bayesian epistemology’ became an epistemological movement in the 20 century, though its two main features can be traced back to the eponymous Reverend Thomas Bayes (c. 1701–61). Those two featuresExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...