• DOI:10.1080/14742250801930822
• Corpus ID: 145371245

A Tale of Two Churches: The Ecclesiologies of The Episcopal Church and the Church of England Compared

@article{Podmore2007ATO,
  title={A Tale of Two Churches: The Ecclesiologies of The Episcopal Church and the Church of England Compared},
  author={Colin Podmore},
  journal={International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church},
  year={2007},
  volume={8},
  pages={124 - 154}
}

• C. Podmore
• Published 3 December 2007
• Philosophy
• International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church

This article compares key aspects of the ecclesiologies of The Episcopal Church and the Church of England. First, it examines and contrasts the underlying logic of their structures and the relationships between their constituent parts (General Synod/General Convention, diocese, parish/congregation). Against this background, it then looks at the place of bishops in the ecclesiologies of the two churches (in relation to clergy and parishes, in relation to diocesan synods/conventions and standing committees, and nationally). The American Presiding Bishop's role is contrasted with the traditional roles of primate and metropolitan. Throughout, attention is given to origins and historical development. Reference is also made to the relevant constitutional, canonical and liturgical provisions. Rapprochement between the two ecclesiologies is noted, especially with respect to the role of the laity, but the article argues that this is far from complete. Each church's ecclesiology continues to be determined by its origins; important modifications have been made within that framework, rather than overturning it. It is hoped that the analysis will illuminate the current disputes within The Episcopal Church and the crisis within the Anglican Communion that they have prompted.