A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy of Nonductal Adenocarcinomatous Pancreatic Tumor (NDACPT) in the Pancreatic Body and Tail

@article{Yi2017ASR,
  title={A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy of Nonductal Adenocarcinomatous Pancreatic Tumor (NDACPT) in the Pancreatic Body and Tail},
  author={Xiaojiang Yi and Sile Chen and Wei Wang and Liaonan Zou and Dechang Diao and Yansheng Zheng and Yaobin He and Hongming Li and Lijie Luo and Wenjun Xiong and Jin Wan},
  journal={Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy \& Percutaneous Techniques},
  year={2017},
  volume={27},
  pages={206–219}
}
Background: Currently, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is regarded as a safe and effective surgical approach for lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. This review examined the evidence from published data of comparative studies of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy of nonductal adenocarcinomatous pancreatic tumor in pancreatic body and tail. Methods: A systematic review of the studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy was conducted. Comparative studies… 
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas: a single-center comparative study
TLDR
LDP was associated with significantly less operative blood loss but a longer operation time than ODP and should be considered as the first-line treatment for benign and low-grade malignant lesions in the left side of the pancreas.
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign, pre-malignant, and low grade malignant pancreatic tumors
TLDR
LDP showed there was no difference in the occurrence of POPF, complication and hospital stay, and LDP was also significantly better in the view point of the feeding advance, which means LDP is safer and more favorable to patients than ODP.
[Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].
TLDR
Minimally invasive surgery for PCL has the potential to reduce the operative trauma to the patients, while at the same time causing comparable or less morbidity, which requires an increasing specialization of complex minimally invasive resections.
Outcome of minimally-invasive versus open pancreatectomies for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: A 2:1 matched case-control study
TLDR
MIP is a safe and viable option in the management of SPPN with the benefit of a shorter postoperative length of stay at the expense of a longer operation time.
Impact of laparoscopy in patients aged over 70 years requiring distal pancreatectomy: a French multicentric comparative study
TLDR
The laparoscopic approach seems to reduce blood loss, postoperative confusion, and length of stay in elderly patients requiring distal pancreatectomy in this subgroup of patients.
Surgical approaches for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review.
TLDR
In MIDP, a standardized approach and precise knowledge of anatomy facilitates safe surgery and has the advantage of a shorter learning curve.
Updated Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
TLDR
Minimally invasive surgery can reach lower recurrence rate, higher long-term survival rate, and better outcomes in terms of estimated blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, R0 rate, mortality, overall complications, and severe complications for pNENs.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Pancreatectomies for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas.
TLDR
Minimally invasive pancreatectomy for SPPN is associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements and a shorter postoperative time to diet and hospital stay.
Does tumor size influence the outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy?
TLDR
LDP can be safely performed laparoscopically with outcomes similar to those for smaller tumors, and correlation between tumor size and operative time and blood loss was found.
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Matched Studies Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: Is It a Safe Procedure?
TLDR
This study represents the strongest evidence (level 3a) to date that LDPs are a safe operation, however, there is still a need for randomized controlled trials to confirm this.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.
  • T. Jin, K. Altaf, +6 authors Q. Xia
  • Medicine
    HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
  • 2012
TLDR
Laroscopic resection results in improved operative and postoperative outcomes compared with open surgery according to the results of the present meta-analyses and may be a safe and feasible option for patients with lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas.
Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
TLDR
The laparoscopic approach in the treatment of PDAC seems to be safe and efficacious, however, additional prospective, randomised, multicentric trials are needed to correctly evaluate the laparoscope approach in PDAC.
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy: is it worthwhile? A meta-analysis of laparoscopic pancreatectomy
TLDR
This meta-analysis suggests that LDP is a reasonable operative method for benign tumors and some ductal carcinomas in the pancreas and shows significantly better perioperative outcomes than ODP.
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Benign or Premalignant Pancreatic Lesions: Is It Really More Cost-Effective than Open Approach?
TLDR
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy can be considered not only safe and feasible but also permits a better quality of life and is acceptable in terms of cost-effectiveness to Italian and European health care services.
Comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.
TLDR
LDP appears to be a safe, desirable procedure for the management of benign pancreatic diseases, with outcomes similar to ODP, and no significant differences between the two groups in complication rates or postoperative recovery.
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution
TLDR
The LDPR procedure is associated with operative times and complication rates similar to those for ODPR, but LDPR has the advantages of an earlier return to normal bowel movements and normal diet and shorter hospital stays than ODPR.
Distal Pancreatic Resection for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Is Laparoscopic Really Better than Open?
TLDR
The results show that LDP for PNETs is cost-neutral and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes and survival.
Laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas.
TLDR
LDP for SPT has short-term benefits compared with ODP, and long-term outcomes of LDP are similar to those of ODP.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...