A Systematic Literature Review of Twitter Research from a Socio-Political Revolution Perspective
@article{Buettner2016ASL, title={A Systematic Literature Review of Twitter Research from a Socio-Political Revolution Perspective}, author={R. Buettner and Katharina B{\"u}ttner}, journal={2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)}, year={2016}, pages={2206-2215} }
From a socio-political revolution perspective we review Twitter-related literature included in top peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and build up a comprehensive picture. Based on this we identify empirical and design-oriented research needs.
18 Citations
How Image-Based Social Media Websites Support Social Movements
- Computer Science, Sociology
- CHI Extended Abstracts
- 2017
- 6
- PDF
Twitter and Research: A Systematic Literature Review Through Text Mining
- History, Computer Science
- IEEE Access
- 2020
- 14
- PDF
The Role of External Actors in Supporting Social and Political Action towards Empowerment and Accountability with a Focus on Fragile, Conflict- and Violence-Affected Settings
- Political Science
- 2017
- 2
Getting a job via career-oriented social networking markets
- Economics, Computer Science
- Electron. Mark.
- 2017
- 35
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 123 REFERENCES
A social influence perspective on expressive political participation in Twitter: the case of #OccupyGezi
- Sociology
- 2015
- 58
Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological innovation for the analysis of big data
- Sociology
- 2013
- 211
Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change
- Sociology
- 2013
- 36
- PDF
A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics
- Computer Science
- Aslib J. Inf. Manag.
- 2014
- 142
Social media and the transformation of activist communication: exploring the social media ecology of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests
- Sociology
- 2014
- 87
- PDF
The real-time power of Twitter: Crisis management and leadership in an age of social media
- Political Science
- 2015
- 72
- PDF