A Survey of Explanations in Recommender Systems

@article{Tintarev2007ASO,
  title={A Survey of Explanations in Recommender Systems},
  author={Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff},
  journal={2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop},
  year={2007},
  pages={801-810}
}
  • N. Tintarev, J. Masthoff
  • Published 17 April 2007
  • Computer Science
  • 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop
This paper provides a comprehensive review of explanations in recommender systems. We highlight seven possible advantages of an explanation facility, and describe how existing measures can be used to evaluate the quality of explanations. Since explanations are not independent of the recommendation process, we consider how the ways recommendations are presented may affect explanations. Next, we look at different ways of interacting with explanations. The paper is illustrated with examples of… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Explaining Recommendations
TLDR
This thesis investigates the properties of a good explanation in a movie recommender system using a movie review corpus and focus groups and suggests seven criteria for evaluation of explanations in recommender systems.
Explanations of recommendations
TLDR
This thesis focuses on explanations of recommendations, and considers both an explanation's content and its presentation, and how explanations can be optimized for some of these aims.
Do Users Appreciate Explanations of Recommendations? An Analysis in the Movie Domain
TLDR
In this paper, insights into users’ needs regarding the inclusion of explanations in a movie recommender system are provided and experimental results show that users do not always appreciate explanations.
A Review on Explanations in Recommender Systems
This report discusses the explanations in the domain of recommender systems: A review of the research papers in the domain, the different explanation interfaces and the evaluation criteria, our
The Reason Why: A Survey of Explanations for Recommender Systems
TLDR
This work deals with the problem of retrieving and evaluating explanations based on hybrid recommenders, and presents an attribute explanation retrieval approach to provide these reasons and shows how to evaluate such approaches.
How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems
Explanations In Recommender Systems : Overview And Research Approaches
TLDR
A comprehensive review on the main research fields of explanations in recommender systems along with suitable examples from literature shows that transparency, validity, scrutability, trust, relevance, persuasiveness, comprehensibility, effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction and education can increase the system's trustworthiness.
Visualization of Explanations in Recommender Systems
TLDR
The results show that explanations with simple graphs and descriptions can better present explanations (meaning that complex graphical interfaces can confuse users), and the relationship between visualization of explanations and other disciplines such as human computer interaction and decision making is discussed.
Understanding the Effects of Explanation Types and User Motivations on Recommender System Use
TLDR
This paper presents a mixed study where it is hypothesize that the type of explanation, as well as user motivation for watching movies, will affect how users respond to recommendation system explanations.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES
Explanation in Recommender Systems
  • D. McSherry
  • Computer Science
    Artificial Intelligence Review
  • 2005
TLDR
It is shown how the relevance of any question the user is asked can be explained in terms of its ability to discriminate between competing cases, thus giving users a unique insight into the recommendation process.
Explaining Recommendations: Satisfaction vs. Promotion
TLDR
This work presents two new methods for explaining recommendations of contentbased and/or collaborative systems and experimentally shows that they actually improve user’s estimation of item quality.
Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations
TLDR
This paper presents experimental evidence that shows that providing explanations can improve the acceptance of ACF systems, and presents a model for explanations based on the user's conceptual model of the recommendation process.
Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
TLDR
The key decisions in evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems are reviewed: the user tasks being evaluated, the types of analysis and datasets being used, the ways in which prediction quality is measured, the evaluation of prediction attributes other than quality, and the user-based evaluation of the system as a whole.
An Empirical Study on Consumer Behavior in the Interaction with Knowledge-based Recommender Applications
  • A. Felfernig, B. Gula
  • Computer Science, Business
    The 8th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services (CEC/EEE'06)
  • 2006
TLDR
This paper presents results from a user study, which focused on the analysis of effects of different recommendation mechanisms on the overall customer acceptance of recommender technologies.
The role of transparency in recommender systems
TLDR
Preliminary results indicate that users like and feel more confident about recommendations that they perceive as transparent, and the role of transprency (user understanding of why a particular recommendation was made) in Recommender Systems is examined.
Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems
TLDR
This paper proposes informal arguments that the recommender community should move beyond the conventional accuracy metrics and their associated experimental methodologies, and proposes new user-centric directions for evaluating recommender systems.
Thinking Positively - Explanatory Feedback for Conversational Recommender Systems
TLDR
This paper describes how this approach to explanation is tightly coupled with the generation of compound critiques, which act as a form of feedback for the users and argues that these explanation-rich critiques have the potential to dramatically improve recommender performance and usability.
Comparison-Based Recommendation
TLDR
This paper describes and evaluates a novel comparison-based recommendation framework which is designed to utilise preference-based feedback, and presents results that highlight the benefits of a number of new query revision strategies and evidence to suggest that the popular more-like-this strategy may be flawed.
Trust building with explanation interfaces
TLDR
Results of a significant-scale user study indicate that the organization-based explanation is highly effective in building users' trust in the recommendation interface, with the benefit of increasing users' intention to return to the agent and save cognitive effort.
...
1
2
3
4
...