A Structural Mechanism of Integrin αIIbβ3 “Inside-Out” Activation as Regulated by Its Cytoplasmic Face


which induces cascades of intracellular signaling events, including protein phosphorylation and cytoskel-etal reorganization (Schwartz et al., 1995; Shattil and Ginsberg, 1997). However, ligand binding to integrins is not simply controlled by ligand availability but also through " inside-out " signaling: cellular stimulation clus-3 Joseph J. Jacobs Center for Thrombosis and ters integrins or alters conformation to increase their Vascular Biology avidity or affinity for ligands (Ginsberg et al. The proto-The Cleveland Clinic Foundation typic example of such integrin activation via inside-out 9500 Euclid Avenue signaling occurs with ␣ IIb ␤ 3. Platelets express ␣ IIb ␤ 3 on Cleveland, Ohio 44195 their surface, but only if the cells have been stimulated with an agonist that induces the appropriate inside-out signal does the receptor engage fibrinogen. Such inside-Summary out regulation of ␣ IIb ␤ 3 affinity allows for rapid platelet aggregation to prevent excess bleeding while pre-Activation of the ligand binding function of integrin venting uncontrolled receptor occupancy, resulting in heterodimers requires transmission of an " inside-out " thrombosis (Plow and Byzova, 1999). signal from their small intracellular segments to their As the trigger point of inside-out signaling, the integrin large extracellular domains. The structure of the cyto-cytoplasmic face has been the focus of intense investi-plasmic domain of a prototypic integrin ␣ IIb ␤ 3 has been gations (reviewed in Woodside et al., 2001). These stud-solved by NMR and reveals multiple hydrophobic and ies have revealed that (1) while intact integrin can remain electrostatic contacts within the membrane-proximal latent both in unstimulated cells and in a purified state, helices of its ␣ and the ␤ cytoplasmic tails. The inter-deletion of the cytoplasmic and transmembrane region face interactions are disrupted by point mutations or activates the receptor (Peterson et al., 1998); (2) point the cytoskeletal protein talin that are known to activate mutations in the membrane-proximal regions of the cy-the receptor. These results provide a structural mech-toplasmic tails or deletion of either can result in constitu-anism by which a handshake between the ␣ and the tive activation of the receptor (O'Toole et al., 1994; ␤ cytoplasmic tails restrains the integrin in a resting replacement of the cyto-state and unclasping of this interaction triggers the plasmic-transmembrane regions by heterodimeric inside-out conformational signal that leads to receptor coiled-coil peptides or an artificial linkage of the tails activation. inactivates the receptor, and breakage of the coiled-coil or clasp activates the receptor (Lu et al., 2001; …

DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6

Extracted Key Phrases

6 Figures and Tables

Citations per Year

368 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 368 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Vinogradova2002ASM, title={A Structural Mechanism of Integrin αIIbβ3 “Inside-Out” Activation as Regulated by Its Cytoplasmic Face}, author={Olga Vinogradova and Algirdas Velyvis and Asta Velyviene and Bin Hu and Thomas A. Haas and Edward F. Plow and Jun Qin}, journal={Cell}, year={2002}, volume={110}, pages={587-597} }