A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems

@article{Myers2011ASO,
  title={A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems},
  author={Michael D. Myers and Heinz K. Klein},
  journal={MIS Q.},
  year={2011},
  volume={35},
  pages={17-36}
}
While criteria or principles for conducting positivist and interpretive research have been widely discussed in the IS research literature, criteria or principles for critical research are lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose a set of principles for the conduct of critical research in information systems. We examine the nature of the critical research perspective, clarify its significance, and review its major discourses, recognizing that its mission and methods cannot be… Expand

Tables and Topics from this paper

Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems
  • D. Wynn, Clay K. Williams
  • Sociology
  • 2012
Critical realism is emerging as a viable philosophical paradigm for conducting social science research, and has been proposed as an alternative to the more prevalent paradigms of positivism andExpand
On methods, methodologies and how they matter
TLDR
The paper argues for a (re)turn to methodology conceived as a theory of inquiry that is contextually sensitive and evolving within a research project and proposes a broader focus on research methodology that is concerned with the ontological, epistemological, and normative assumptions behind research methods and their inherent limitations. Expand
Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems
TLDR
This article proposes a set of methodological principles for conducting and evaluating critical realism-based explanatory case study research within the information systems field, derived directly from the ontological and epistemological assumptions of critical realism. Expand
Critical Discourse Analysis as a Review Methodology: An Empirical Example
TLDR
This paper presents a method with guiding principles and steps for systematically conducting critical reviews of IS literature based on Habermasian strains of critical discourse analysis, and provides an empirical example of the method. Expand
Focus groups and critical social IS research: how the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers
TLDR
The paper presents the argument that focus groups, if designed and executed in light of a critical approach, can contribute to the emancipation of researchers and respondents and develops a set of guiding questions that provide a means to ensure that the emancipatory potential of focus group research can be achieved. Expand
Truth and Correctness: Towards A Pluralist Framework for Validating Information Systems Research
TLDR
The nature of truth and relatedly correctness are examined in order to construct a validation framework that can potentially encompass all the varied forms of research and apply it to a range of research forms. Expand
Making sense of the information systems use field
Information Systems (IS) Use has been discussed for more than three decades. During this time various perspectives of IS Use are found in the literature, which leads to a complex picture. Thus theExpand
Beyond Bourdieu, Foucault and Habermas: Review and Assessment of Critical Information Systems Research
This paper presents a literature review of critical information systems (IS) research. Specifically, it focuses on how IS researchers have responded to Myers and Klein’s (2011) call to considerExpand
Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks
The expanding popularity of qualitative research, and more particularly case study research, in the field of Information Systems, Organization and Management research, seems to have been accompaniedExpand
The Ontological, Epistemological and Methodological Debates in Information Systems Research: A Partial Review
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ontological, epistemological and methodological debates in information systems (IS) research based on the philosophical assumptions in management andExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 127 REFERENCES
The Choice of Critical Information Systems Research
TLDR
This paper examines the enactment of the critical tradition in IS research and the possibilities for new insights that can arise from shifting the lens from positivist or interpretive to critical, followed by some recommendations for addressing these issues. Expand
Doing critical research in information systems: a case of theory and practice not informing each other *
  • K. McGrath
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Inf. Syst. J.
  • 2005
TLDR
It is suggested that the IS field now accepts broad definitions of the nature of being critical, but despite having a body of empirical critical research from which to learn, the authors are not making the most of their opportunities to do so, which retards further development. Expand
Exploring the critical agenda in information systems research
This special issue of the Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is dedicated to critical information systems (IS) research that involves a wide range of diverse research endeavours that explore theExpand
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems
TLDR
A set of principles for the conduct and evaluation of interpretive field research in information systems is proposed, along with their philosophical rationale, and the usefulness of the principles is illustrated by evaluating three publishedinterpretive field studies drawn from the IS research literature. Expand
A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001
TLDR
The field has been dominated by the positivist paradigm, despite calls to the contrary, and if the field was to truly embrace pluralism it would have to find ways to fundamentally change the publication practices of the journal system, including the current tenure and promotion system, which pose considerable obstacles for the acceptance of alternative paradigms. Expand
Conducting and Evaluating Critical Interpretive Research: Examining Criteria as a Key Component in Building a Research Tradition
  • M. Pozzebon
  • Political Science, Computer Science
  • Relevant Theory and Informed Practice
  • 2004
TLDR
This paper advocating the timely emergence of a critical interpretive perspective in IS research and pressing the argument that an extended version of Golden-Biddle and Locke’s (1993) criteria is not only appropriate but comprehensive as initial guidelines for conducting and evaluating criticalinterpretive research. Expand
Doing critical IS research: the question of methodology
INTRODUCTION Critical information systems (IS) research denotes a critical process of inquiry that seeks to achieve emancipatory social change by going beyond the apparent to reveal hidden agendas,Expand
Critical research in information systems: looking forward, looking back
TLDR
The papers chosen address theoretical foundations, paradigmatic and methodological issues, empirical studies and praxis and reflexivity in critical information systems research. Expand
Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions
TLDR
It is suggested that much can be gained if a plurality of research perspectives is effectively employed to investigate information systems phenomena and that there exist other philosophical assumptions that can inform studies of the relationships between information technology, people, and organizations. Expand
The mysterious case of the missing paradigm: a review of critical information systems research 1991–2001
TLDR
The mysterious case of the missing paradigm – that of the critical approach to information systems (IS) research is investigated and the development of critical IS research over the period of 1991–2001 is charted. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...