A Revolution in Historiography of Science

@article{Buchdahl1965ARI,
  title={A Revolution in Historiography of Science},
  author={Gerd Buchdahl},
  journal={History of Science},
  year={1965},
  volume={4},
  pages={55 - 69}
}
  • G. Buchdahl
  • Published 1 March 1965
  • Philosophy
  • History of Science
EACH of these two works, in its own peculiar way, bears testimony to the change in our contemporary views about the nature of history of science that has taken place in recent years. Indeed, to believe Professor Kuhn, these changes amount to nothing less than "a historiographic revolution in the study of science" (p. 3). Moreover, what gives this revolution a deeper and more pervasive interest affects not only the historian's ideas about our scientific past but has also a relevance for anyone's… 

Concepts of the 'Scientific Revolution': An analysis of the historiographical appraisal of the traditional claims of the science

[eng] ´Scientific revolution´, as a concept, is both ´philosophically general´ and ´historically unique´. Both dual-sense of the term alludes to the occurrence of great changes in science. The former

History and philosophy of science takes form.

Comparing Traditions: Parallels Between Eastern Mysticism and Western Science

Introduction The Fall 2002 issue of the Comparative Civilizations Review (No. 47) carried an article by Benesch and Wilner entitled "Traditions and Civilizations: Another Approach to Understanding

Kuhn’s Way

This review of the posthumous collection of essays by Thomas S. Kuhn will take the form of a personal obituary. I attempt to offer some background to his scholarly career, find a coherent story in

Contextualizing Unguru’s 1975 Attack on the Historiography of Ancient Greek Mathematics

In 1975 S. Unguru published his controversial paper on the need to rewrite the history of ancient Greek mathematics. The origin of the paper is sketched according to Unguru’s own story, and then the

On the production and structuring of scientific knowledges

Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has contained within it a series of discrepancies, which combine to render impossible the actual theorising of changes in scientific knowledges, and

Las Controversias Históricas en Psicología: ¿Anomalías Irracionales Egotistas o Instancias Estructurales de Debate Racional?

This paper presents an empirical (historical) survey about the insertion, definition and valuation of scientific controversies in psychology on the basis of certain historiographical trends in

Why Was Kuhn’s Structure More Successful than Polanyi’s Personal Knowledge?

  • A. Timmins
  • Philosophy
    HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science
  • 2013
Thomas Kuhn has been seen as the preeminent philosopher in the so-called historicist turn in the philosophy of science, with others—including Michael Polanyi—relegated to his slipstream. Yet the

Kuhn’s Way:

The histories of Kuhn are above average, as he did not conceal controversy and error. Regrettably, he played them down. Unfortunately, he viewed dissent increasingly as verbal variance, considering

Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School

The aim of this article is to explore defining characteristics of schools of thought in economics, with Austrian economics chosen to illustrate some of the themes raised. This article argues that a

References

SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES

Whewell's "Inductive table of astronomy

  • The philosophy of the inductive sciences, ii

(I962), "Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism

  • Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, iii

Philosophy of science, the Deleware seminar, ii

  • 1963