A Quality-Effects Model for Meta-Analysis

@article{Doi2008AQM,
  title={A Quality-Effects Model for Meta-Analysis},
  author={Suhail A. R. Doi and Lukman Thalib},
  journal={Epidemiology},
  year={2008},
  volume={19},
  pages={94-100}
}
We introduce a quality-effects approach that combines evidence from a series of trials comparing 2 interventions. This approach incorporates the heterogeneity of effects in the analysis of the overall interventional efficacy. However, unlike the random-effects model based on observed between-trial heterogeneity, we suggest adjustment based on measured methodological heterogeneity between studies. We propose a simple noniterative procedure for computing the combined effect size under this model… Expand
Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness
TLDR
Some of the common methodological issues that arise when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness data are discussed, including issues related to study designs, meta-analysis, and the use and interpretation of effect sizes. Expand
Methods for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of published observational studies.
TLDR
The summary quality score used for bias adjustment within the context of an appropriate model may be most expedient, and implications for the bias adjustment of meta-analyses of observational studies are discussed. Expand
Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials II: The quality effects model.
This article examines the performance of the updated quality effects (QE) estimator for meta-analysis of heterogeneous studies. It is shown that this approach leads to a decreased mean squared errorExpand
Comparison of bias adjustment methods in meta-analysis suggests that quality effects modelling may have less limitations than other approaches.
TLDR
The advantages and limitations of methods for bias-adjustment in meta-analysis are discussed to inform those using and synthesising research evidence in clinical practice and academia. Expand
Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trials.
TLDR
It is concluded that stratification by quality leads to a form of selection bias (collider-stratification bias) and should be avoided and shown consistent results with an alternative method that includes all studies. Expand
Meta-analysis in evidence-based healthcare: a paradigm shift away from random effects is overdue
TLDR
It is argued for an urgent return to the earlier framework with updates that address problems with the random-effects approach and demonstrated that there exist better estimators under the fixed-effect model framework that can achieve optimal error estimation. Expand
Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: an empirical example.
TLDR
The argument for the use of situation specific weights to integrate results from such trials is presented and the inclusion of appropriate study specific scores in an appropriate meta-analysis model permits the quantification of the variation between studies based on something tangible as opposed to the random adjustments made by the random effects model to the pooled effect size. Expand
Evidence Synthesis for Medical Decision Making and the Appropriate Use of Quality Scores
  • S. Doi
  • Medicine
  • Clinical Medicine & Research
  • 2014
TLDR
This review asserting that probabilistic bias quantification is not possible or even required of quality scores when used in meta-analysis for redistribution of weights is contrasted with the conventional random effects model of meta- analysis to demonstrate why the latter is inadequate in the face of a properly specified quality score weighting method. Expand
Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
TLDR
A simulation study was conducted to compare estimator performance and demonstrates that the IVhet and quality effects estimators, though biased, have the lowest mean squared error. Expand
Meta-analysis I
Meta-analysis is now used in a wide range of disciplines, in particular epidemiology and evidence-based medicine, where the results of some meta-analyses have led to major changes in clinicalExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 52 REFERENCES
Modelling study quality in meta-analysis.
  • D. Tritchler
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Statistics in medicine
  • 1999
TLDR
A probability model is presented for the effect of quality on a summary effect measure, which motivates criteria used to assess quality, and can be used to incorporate quality into the calculation of asummary effect. Expand
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
TLDR
This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies. Expand
Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis.
TLDR
It is concluded that while it is possible to incorporate the effect of variation of quality of individual trials into overviews, this issue requires more study. Expand
A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
TLDR
It is shown that the commonly used DerSimonian and Laird method does not adequately reflect the error associated with parameter estimation, especially when the number of studies is small, and three methods currently used for estimation within the framework of a random effects model are considered. Expand
The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews.
TLDR
This work elaborates on questions such as: what is the concept of quality of individual studies (RCTs), can quality be measured validly and reliably and plans for future research on this issue are proposed. Expand
Meta-analysis of best-evidence synthesis?
  • H. Eysenck
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
  • 1995
TLDR
This article examines the usefulness of meta-analysis, and articulates many of the criticisms that have been made of its workings, and suggests that best-evidence synthesis, or theory-directed analysis, might be a safer option. Expand
An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.
TLDR
In an empirical study of the relation of quality scores to treatment differences in published meta-analyses of 7 groups of controlled randomized clinical trials comprising 107 primary studies, it is found no relation between treatment difference and overall quality score. Expand
Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
TLDR
It is concluded that the test of heterogeneity should not be the sole determinant of model choice in meta-analysis, and inspection of relevant normal plots, as well as clinical insight, may be more relevant to both the investigation and modelling of heterogeneity. Expand
Systematic Reviews: Meta-analysis and its problems
TLDR
Meta-analysis may not be the one best method for studying the diversity of fields for which it has been used, and several problems arise in this work. Expand
Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews.
TLDR
Investigation of artefactual and true causes of heterogeneity form essential steps in moving from a combined effect estimate to application to particular populations and individuals. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...