A Portfolio Analysis of Autism Research Funding in Australia, 2008-2017.

  title={A Portfolio Analysis of Autism Research Funding in Australia, 2008-2017.},
  author={Jacquiline den Houting and Elizabeth Pellicano},
  journal={Journal of autism and developmental disorders},
Autism research funding across the world has disproportionately been invested in biological and genetic research, despite evidence that these topics are not prioritized by community members. We sought to determine whether a similar pattern was evident in Australia's autism research funding landscape between 2008 and 2017, by analysing the nation's portfolio of autism research investments. We also examined whether there was any change in this pattern of funding since the establishment in 2013 of… 

Short report: Patterns of US federal autism research funding during 2017–2019

It is found that autism research funding is not consistent with the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee budget recommendation to increase funding particularly to services and lifespan issues, and it is recommended that funding patterns should shift to better align with these priorities.

Research priorities of the autism community: A systematic review of key stakeholder perspectives

A systematic review of seven studies that reported on key stakeholders’ priorities for autism research found that research that will lead to real-world changes in the daily lives of the autism community and a greater focus on skill training for people with autism across their lives were found to be very important.

‘I’m not just a guinea pig’: Academic and community perceptions of participatory autism research

Quantitative findings indicated that autism research stakeholders in Australia are largely supportive of community engagement in research and have had positive experiences of participatory research, but qualitative findings suggested that participants lacked understanding of participatories research, and held attitudes that may hinder the conduct of successful participatoryResearch.

Participatory autism research: Early career and established researchers’ views and experiences

What needs to change is discussed with regard to changes required at both an individual and systemic level, ensuring that efforts are made to meaningfully involve autistic people and their allies in all stages of the research process.

Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science

This review focuses on three major challenges to the conventional medical paradigm - an overfocus on deficits, an emphasis on the individual as opposed to their broader context and a narrowness of perspective - each of which necessarily constrains what the authors can know about autism and how they are able to know it.

Listening to parents to understand their priorities for autism research

The Q-sort method highlighted different top priorities, with understanding the parent, sibling, child and family impact and stress the highest ranked priority for home, teacher/staff education and support for the school, and recognizing and supporting anxiety for the community.

Publishing standards for promoting excellence in autism research

In a ‘publish or perish’ culture that also values evidence-based practice, journals are an influential part of the system that is currently failing many sectors of society and can make a positive contribution to socio-political change.

How is autism portrayed in news media? A content analysis of Australian newspapers articles from 2016–2018

Advice is concluded with advice for those writing media articles related to autism to minimise the spread of misinformation around autism and to provide a public account of autism and those with autism.

From ivory tower to inclusion: Stakeholders’ experiences of community engagement in Australian autism research

Autistic people, and other community stakeholders, are gaining increasing recognition as valuable contributors to autism research, resulting in a growing corpus of participatory autism research. Yet,

Towards empathetic autism research: Developing an autism-specific Research Passport

Autistic adults sometimes report negative experiences of research participation. People have developed passports or toolkits in other areas where community members report dissatisfaction (e.g.,



What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom

There was a clear disparity between the United Kingdom’s pattern of funding for autism research and the priorities articulated by the majority of participants and there needs to be greater involvement of the autism community both in priority setting and in research more broadly.

Trends in US Autism Research Funding

The shifting landscape of autism research is demonstrated from basic science to clinical and translational research, which significantly increased in the US from 1997 to 2006.

Brief Report: A Survey of Autism Research Priorities Across a Diverse Community of Stakeholders

The results of an online survey that gathered input from community stakeholders regarding autism research priorities can guide decision-making by public and private funders when developing science funding priorities and engaging in science dissemination activities.

Autism spectrum disorder: outcomes in adulthood

The very variable findings reported in this review reflect the problems of conducting research into lifetime outcomes for individuals with a condition as heterogeneous as ASD.

Service Needs Across the Lifespan for Individuals with Autism

It is demonstrated that adults with ASD have more and different needs for services, which can inform policy and program planning to put in place the services adults with autism spectrum disorder need.

The health status of adults on the autism spectrum

Nearly all medical conditions were significantly more common in adults with autism, including immune conditions, gastrointestinal and sleep disorders, seizure, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes.

Autism: A New Introduction to Psychological Theory and Current Debate

The autism research world has made considerable strides since the first edition of Happé’s book, so it is timely that a new version now emerges. As perspectives are frequently diverse (Pellicano,

Democratizing clinical research

Keith Lloyd and Jo White commend a way for patients, clinicians and scientists to set priorities jointly and say it should be a priority to improve quality of life for all parties.