A Plea for Human Nature

  title={A Plea for Human Nature},
  author={Edouard Machery},
  journal={Philosophical Psychology},
  pages={321 - 329}
  • E. Machery
  • Published 1 June 2008
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Psychology
Philosophers of biology, such as David Hull and Michael Ghiselin, have argued that the notion of human nature is incompatible with modern evolutionary biology and they have recommended rejecting this notion. In this article, I rebut this argument: I show that an important notion of human nature is compatible with modern evolutionary biology. 

Human Nature in a Post-essentialist World

In this essay I examine a well-known articulation of human nature skepticism, a paper by Hull. I then review a recent reply to Hull by Machery, which argues for an account of human nature that he

Science and Human Nature

  • R. Samuels
  • Biology, Psychology
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement
  • 2012
There is a puzzling tension in contemporary scientific attitudes towards human nature: talk of human nature abounds in certain regions of the sciences, especially in linguistics, psychology and cognitive science.

Human Nature: The Very Idea

The only biologically respectable notion of human nature is an extremely permissive one that names the reliable dispositions of the human species as a whole. This conception offers no ethical

Human Nature and Respect for the Evolutionarily Given: a Comment on Lewens

It is argued that the same evolutionary and developmental considerations that compel Lewens to reject more plausible conceptions of human nature pose equally serious problems for some prominent critiques of biomedical enhancement that presuppose the existence of a “given” biological potential that can be distorted by agentic cultural influences.

Species, Humans, and Transformations

Do biological species have essences? The debate over this question in philosophy of biology exhibits fundamental confusion both between and within authors. In What to Salvage from the Species

Of humans and lichens

It is suggested that phenotypic typicality and uniformity are considered legitimate assumptions in many human sciences because biological development is interpreted as an inherently conservative process utilising only endogenous developmental resources, while evolution is interpretedAs a normalizing process destroying Phenotypic variation.

Nothing in Ethics Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution? Natural Goodnessand Evolutionary Biology

Philippa Foot (2001) and Rosalind Hursthouse (1999), along with other philosophers, have argued for a metaethical position, the natural goodness approach, that claims moral evaluations are, or are on

Human Nature, Anthropology, and the Problem of Variation

In this essay, I begin with an overview of a traditional account of natural kinds, and then consider David Hull's (1986) critique of species as natural kinds and the associated notion of human

A Developmental Systems Account of Human Nature

We argue here that to understand human nature is to understand the plastic process of human development and the diversity it produces. Drawing on the framework of developmental systems theory and the



Evolution, Population Thinking, and Essentialism

  • E. Sober
  • Philosophy
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1980
Ernst Mayr has argued that Darwinian theory discredited essentialist modes of thought and replaced them with what he has called "population thinking". In this paper, I characterize essentialism as

The vernacular concept of innateness

The proposal that the concept of innateness expresses a ‘folk biological’ theory of the ‘inner natures’ of organisms was tested by examining the response of biologically naive participants to a

On Human Nature

HUMAN nature as understood by that most pessimistic of philosophers, Schopenhauer, is here presented in English dress by Mr. Saunders. The essays which make up the book have been selected and

Existentialism and humanism

Originally delivered as a lecture in Paris in 1945, 'Existentialism and Humanism' is Sartre's seminal defence of his original doctrine of existentialism and a plan for its practical application to

Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science.

Preface 1. Common sense: its scope and limits Part I. Folkbiology: 2. Folktaxonomy 3. The semantics of living kinds Part II. Aristotelian Essentials: 4. Essence and environment 5. Materials of

Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays

This book differs from other recent collections in two ways: it is more explicitly integrative and analytical, centering on issues of general significance such as pluralism and realism about species, and draws on a broader range of disciplines.

Essay Review: Debunking Adapting Minds*

David Buller’s recent book, Adapting Minds, is a philosophical critique of the field of evolutionary psychology. Buller argues that evolutionary psychology is utterly bankrupt from both a theoretical

Evolutionary Essentialism

  • D. Walsh
  • Biology, Philosophy
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2006
It is argued that recent evolutionary developmental biology provides compelling evidence to show that one must appeal to the capacities of organisms to explain what makes adaptive evolution adaptive.

The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Index

These two 1985 volumes provide a translation of the philosophical works of Descartes, based on the best available Latin and French texts. They are intended to replace the only reasonably

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

S FROM THE BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Volume 15, No's. 57, 58, 59% 60; 1964-65 B.J.P.S., 15 (57), 1964. On the foundations of statistics, Ian HACKING. Long run frequency is here