A Paradigm of Prevention: Humpty Dumpty, the War on Terror, and the Power of Preventive Detention in the United States, Israel, and Europe

@article{Stahlberg2011APO,
  title={A Paradigm of Prevention: Humpty Dumpty, the War on Terror, and the Power of Preventive Detention in the United States, Israel, and Europe},
  author={Tim Stahlberg and Henning Lahmann},
  journal={American Journal of Comparative Law},
  year={2011},
  volume={59},
  pages={1051-1087}
}
A decade into the proclaimed “global war on terror,” states are still struggling with the phenomenon’s locus and definition under the effective laws. Remarkably, preventive detention of suspected terrorists fluctuates between various legal regimes: In Europe, criminal law is predominantly used but special security orders are occasionally issued as well; Israel applies in part the law of international armed conflicts; and in the United States, detention under a new war premise has been claimed… 

The ABC of the OPT: A Legal Lexicon of the Israeli Control over the Occupied Palestinian Territory

Israel's half-a-century long rule over the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and some of its surrounding legal issues, have been the subject of extensive academic literature. Yet, to date, there has been no

Enforcing Global Corporate Social Accountability in Europe

The economy operates globally but is regulated locally. Local regulation however sometimes fails to enforce fundamental environmental, labour, and human rights. At the same time, due to significant

Possible Elements of the Cyber Emergency Regime

  • Henning Lahmann
  • Political Science
    Unilateral Remedies to Cyber Operations
  • 2020

International Legal Framework

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

Lessons for human rights and humanitarian law in the war on terror: comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings case

Abstract The article examines and compares two recent judgments which provide some of the most valuable examples of the difficulties surrounding the application of international humanitarian law to

Congressional Authorization and the War on Terrorism

This Article presents a framework for interpreting Congress's September 18, 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), the central statutory enactment related to the war on terrorism.

The Status of Terrorists

This paper identifies and analyzes two legal questions raised by the war against the al Qaeda terrorist organization. First, did the September 11, 2001 attacks initiate a war, or "international armed

Hamdan, Lebanon, and the Regulation of Armed Hostilities: The Need to Recognize a Hybrid Category of Armed Conflict

For more than fifty years following the 1949 revision of the Geneva Conventions, the articles that defined when the protections of these treaties came into force - Common Articles 2 and 3 - were

International Standards for Detaining Terrorism Suspects: Moving Beyond the Armed Conflict-Criminal Divide

Under what circumstances does international law permit a state to detain terrorism suspects not captured in a theater of combat? There continues to be confusion on this question, but two dominant

State of Exception

Two months after the attacks of 9/11, the Bush administration, in the midst of what it perceived to be a state of emergency, authorized the indefinite detention of noncitizens suspected of terrorist

An Appraisal of US Practice Relating to 'Enemy Combatants'

This note explores the use and abuse by the U.S. of the law of armed conflict, and related consequences in the realm of international human rights obligations, that result from designation of persons

The relationship between international humanitarian and human rights law where it matters: admissible killing and internment of fighters in non-international armed conflicts

Abstract This article explores the relationship between international humanitarian and human rights law during non-international armed conflict. It seeks to answer two questions which are crucial in

On Some Merits of the Israeli Judgment on Targeted Killings

The recent judgment by the Israeli Supreme Court on targeted killings is a landmark decision in many respects. Its main merit lies in trying to give precision to, and therefore make concretely

The Targeted Killings Judgment and the Scope of Direct Participation in Hostilities

The Judgment is the first in depth analysis of the notion of direct participation in hostilities in International Humanitarian Law. This notion encompasses the direct participation by civilians in