A Note on the "Proof" of Utility in J. S. Mill

@article{Popkin1950ANO,
  title={A Note on the "Proof" of Utility in J. S. Mill},
  author={Richard Henry Popkin},
  journal={Ethics},
  year={1950},
  volume={61},
  pages={66 - 68}
}
  • R. Popkin
  • Published 1 October 1950
  • Philosophy, Economics
  • Ethics
The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it: and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince… 
13 Citations

An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Utility and Justice

I n Chapter 5 of Utilitarianism , entitled “On the Connection between Justice and Utility,” Mill acknowledges that one of the strongest objections to utilitarianism as a complete account of ethics is

An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Mill's Life and Philosophical Background

U tilitarianism as a distinct tradition in ethical thought was founded by Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832). The principle of utility, that the production of happiness and elimination of unhappiness should

An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics: Was Mill an Act- or Rule-Utilitarian?

I n the twentieth century a distinction has been made between forms of utilitarianism in which the rightness or wrongness of actions is a matter of the consequences of each particular action, case by

An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics

Introduction 1. Mill's life and philosophical background 2. Mill's criticism of alternative theories 3. Qualities of pleasure 4. Was Mill an act- or rule-utilitarian? 5. Sanctions and moral

References

The "Proof" of Utility in Bentham and Mill

The ostensible object of the present paper is to correct an interpretation that, in the author’s estimation, involves a grave historical injustice. Frankly, however, this would never have been