A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms

@article{Ruggiero2015AHL,
  title={A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms},
  author={M. Ruggiero and D. Gordon and Thomas Orrell and N. Bailly and T. Bourgoin and R. Brusca and T. Cavalier-smith and M. Guiry and P. Kirk},
  journal={PLoS ONE},
  year={2015},
  volume={10}
}
We present a consensus classification of life to embrace the more than 1.6 million species already provided by more than 3,000 taxonomists’ expert opinions in a unified and coherent, hierarchically ranked system known as the Catalogue of Life (CoL). The intent of this collaborative effort is to provide a hierarchical classification serving not only the needs of the CoL’s database providers but also the diverse public-domain user community, most of whom are familiar with the Linnaean conceptual… Expand
Proposal for practical multi-kingdom classification of eukaryotes based on monophyly and comparable divergence time criteria
TLDR
This work proposes an alternative classification system for the domain Eukarya to improve hierarchical taxonomical comparability for animals, plants, fungi and multiple protist groups and proposes 32 kingdoms of eukaryotes that are treated in 10 subdomains. Expand
How many kingdoms of life? Eukaryotic phylogeny and philosophy of systematics
According to contemporary understanding of the universal tree of life, the traditionally recognized kingdoms of eukaryotic organisms— Protista, Fungi, Animalia and Plantae—are irregularlyExpand
A community‐derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns
TLDR
A modern, comprehensive classification for lycophytes and ferns, down to the genus level, utilizing a community‐based approach, that uses monophyly as the primary criterion for the recognition of taxa, but also aims to preserve existing taxa and circumscriptions that are both widely accepted and consistent with the understanding of pteridophyte phylogeny. Expand
Stop the Abuse of Time! Strict Temporal Banding is not the Future of Rank-Based Classifications in Fungi (Including Lichens) and Other Organisms
Abstract Classification is the most important approach to cataloging biological diversity. It serves as a principal means of communication between scientific disciplines, as well as betweenExpand
Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes
TLDR
It is confirmed that eukaryotes form at least two domains, the loss of monophyly in the Excavata, robust support for the Haptista and Cryptista, and suggested primer sets for DNA sequences from environmental samples that are effective for each clade are provided. Expand
Reconciliation of taxonomy with laboratory fish research communities
TLDR
A feasible solution from the standpoint of avoiding taxonomic name changes if possible is proposed, especially with respect to the zebrafish Danio rerio (Hamilton 1822), whose family name could change. Expand
Divergence and ranking of taxa across the kingdoms Animalia, Fungi and Plantae
TLDR
It is found that groups of Animalia classified as phyla, classes, orders and families, diverged earlier as compared to those of the kingdoms Fungi and Plantae, which suggests that animal taxonomists have been more liberal when splitting ranks at the phylum, class and order levels, while at the family level the ranking across kingdoms is comparable. Expand
What Defines the "Kingdom" Fungi?
TLDR
This article will also summarize ongoing work focusing on taxon discovery, combined with phylogenomic analysis, which has identified novel groups that lie proximate/adjacent to the fungal clade-wherever the boundary that defines the Fungi may be. Expand
Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes
TLDR
This version of the phylogenetic classification of bony fishes is substantially improved, providing resolution for more taxa than previous versions, based on more densely sampled phylogenetic trees. Expand
Taxallnomy: an extension of NCBI Taxonomy that produces a hierarchically complete taxonomic tree
  • Tetsu Sakamoto, José Miguel Ortega
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • BMC Bioinform.
  • 2021
TLDR
An algorithm is developed that takes the tree structure from NCBI Taxonomy and generates a hierarchically complete taxonomic table, maintaining its compatibility with the original tree, and it is named Taxallnomy because it contains names for all taxonomic-ranks. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 121 REFERENCES
Evaluating Support for the Current Classification of Eukaryotic Diversity
TLDR
It is demonstrated that supergroup taxonomies are unstable and that support for groups varies tremendously, indicating that the current classification scheme of eukaryotes is likely premature. Expand
To name or not to name: Criteria to promote economy of change in Linnaean classification schemes.
TLDR
It is concluded that not all TNCs lead to equally informative and stable taxonomies and provides a workflow scheme to guide the procedure of taxonomic decisions concerning the creation or modification of supraspecific classifications. Expand
The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists
TLDR
This revision of the classification of unicellular eukaryotes updates that of Levine et al. (1980) for the protozoa and expands it to include other protists, and proposes a scheme that is based on nameless ranked systematics. Expand
A phylogenetic classification of the land plants to accompany APG III
TLDR
A formal classification of the land plants that is compatible with the APG III classification is proposed, and two new names are established: Amborellanae and Austrobaileyanae. Expand
Animal biodiversity: An introduction to higher-level classification and taxonomic richness
For the kingdom Animalia, 1,552,319 species have been described in 40 phyla in a new evolutionary classification. Among these, the phylum Arthropoda alone represents 1,242,040 species, or about 80%Expand
“Evolutionary” classifications do not have any information content—a reply to Stuessy and Hörandl
TLDR
The author examines the arguments advanced by proponents of the acceptance of paraphyletic taxa in the botanical literature to examine if any of them stood up to critical evaluation, and finds none of the claims to be convincing. Expand
The importance of comprehensive phylogenetic (evolutionary) classification—a response to Schmidt‐Lebuhn's commentary on paraphyletic taxa
The review of paraphyly in botanical systematics by Schmidt‐Lebuhn brings together a number of useful perspectives for the reader. It fails to offer new ideas, however, and it does not recognize theExpand
Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods
  • A. Hejnol, M. Obst, +14 authors C. Dunn
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2009
TLDR
New sequence data and methods strongly uphold previous suggestions that Acoelomorpha is sister clade to all other bilaterian animals, find diminishing evidence for the placement of the enigmatic Xenoturbella within Deuterostomia, and place Cycliophora with Entoprocta and EctoproCTa. Expand
A revised six‐kingdom system of life
  • T. Cavalier-smith
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • 1998
TLDR
A revised six‐kingdom system of life is presented, down to the level of infraphylum, modified in the light of molecular phylogenetic evidence that Myxozoa are actually Animalia, not Protozoa, and that mesozoans are related to bilaterian animals. Expand
Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions
TLDR
The relationships of the five main metazoan lineages—Porifera, Ctenophora, Placozoa, Cnidaria and Bilateria—remain subject to conflicting topologies according to different taxonomic samples and analytical approaches. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...