A Fallacy Analysis of the Arguments on the First U.S. Presidential Debate Between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

  title={A Fallacy Analysis of the Arguments on the First U.S. Presidential Debate Between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump},
  author={Jennifer Marella Santoso},
  journal={K@ta Kita},
  • J. Santoso
  • Published 16 November 2018
  • Philosophy
  • K@ta Kita
This research studies the fallacy in the arguments on the first 2016 U.S. presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. This research is aimed to find out the fallacies occurred in the debate, the dominant fallacy made by each candidate, and the similarities and differences in each candidate’s fallacy. The topic on fallacy is chosen because fallacies are persuasive, yet misleading arguments which might contribute on influencing the people’s vote. In analyzing the data, the… 

Tables from this paper


This research aimed at finding the types of logical fallacies on Indonesia presidential debates made particularly by one of the presidential candidates, Joko Widodo, during the 2019 Indonesia

An Analysis of Logical Fallacy on Prabowo Subianto's Argumentation during 2019 Indonesia Presidential Debate

There have been a considerable number of studies of fallacy concerning with presidential debates in Western countries particularly on American presidential debates. However, the study is still rarely

Analysis of Logical Fallacy on the Arguments Made by Student from 2019 Indonesian Protests and Riots in Television Debates

AbstractThis study sought to identify the many sorts of logical fallacies used in Indonesian television debates, notably those made by students who participated in the 2019 protests and rioting

An Analysis of Logical Fallacy in Argument of Campaign Team of Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto

This research was aimed to find the types of logical fallacies in argument of campaign team debate of Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto. This research was descriptive qualitative. The data were



Writing Arguments : A Rhetoric with Readings

I.OVERVIEW OF ARGUMENT. 1.Argument: An Introduction. What Do We Mean By Argument? The Defining Features of Argument. Argument and the Problem of Truth. A Successful Process of Argumentation: The

Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making

1. Argumentation, Critical Thinking and Decision Making. 2. Foundations of Debate. 3. Foundations of Argument. 4. Obstacles to Clear Thinking. 5. Ethical and Cultural Considerations. 6. The Debate

Argumentation and critical decision making

Preface Part One Principles 1 Defining Argumentation Elements of Argumentation Elements of Critical Decision Making Conclusion Projects/Exercises 2 Appraising Argumentation Argumentation and Being

The Critical Thinking Handbook

Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument

Preface. I. DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARGUMENT. 1. Argument and Critical Thought. Critical Thought. Argumentation and Argument Argument Contexts 2. Co-Orientational View of Argument.

2016, September). Donald Trump ESTP Hillary Clinton INTJ - leadership styles. Retrieved from Personality Pathways: http://www.personalitypathways.com/article/trumpclinton-mbti-type.html

  • 2016

Donald Trump wrong that ' you will learn more ' from financial disclosure form than from tax returns

  • 2016

Donald Trump ESTP Hillary Clinton INTJ - leadership styles

    It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote

    • Retrieved March 29,
    • 2017