A Duty to Kill? A Duty to Die? Rethinking the Euthanasia Controversy of 1906

  title={A Duty to Kill? A Duty to Die? Rethinking the Euthanasia Controversy of 1906},
  author={J. Appel},
  journal={Bulletin of the History of Medicine},
  pages={610 - 634}
  • J. Appel
  • Published 2004
  • Medicine
  • Bulletin of the History of Medicine
This essay seeks to chronicle the controversy surrounding euthanasia that came to a head in the United States around 1906, and to situate that debate in a meaningful historical context. An extensive examination of newspaper coverage of the legislative proposals to legalize the practice in Ohio and Iowa reveals that (1) the discourse occurred in a context in which both supporters and opponents of euthanasia generally agreed that the practice already occurred with frequency; (2) the discussion… Expand
12 Citations

Topics from this paper

I. Feminism and the ‘right to die’: Editorial introduction to the Special Feature
How dying became a ‘life crisis’
Good Life Good Death According to Christiaan Barnard
  • L. Toledo-Pereyra
  • Medicine
  • Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research
  • 2010
Pros and Cons of Physician Aid in Dying
Sympathy, Disability, and the Nurse: Female Power in Edith Wharton’s The Fruit of the Tree
  • Rebecca Garden
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The Journal of medical humanities
  • 2010


The History of Euthanasia Debates in the United States and Britain
The Liberal Education of Charles Eliot Norton
A question of life or death.
[Euthanasia is murder].
  • P. Gulbrandsen
  • Medicine
  • Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke
  • 2001
It's Over, Debbie.
The Dilemmas of Euthanasia