A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

@article{Jost2004ADO,
  title={A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo},
  author={John T. Jost and Mahzarin R. Banaji and Brian A. Nosek},
  journal={Political Psychology},
  year={2004},
  volume={25},
  pages={881-919}
}
Most theories in social and political psychology stress self-interest, intergroup conflict, ethnocentrism, homophily, ingroup bias, outgroup antipathy, dominance, and resistance. System justification theory is influenced by these perspectives—including social identity and social dominance theories—but it departs from them in several respects. Advocates of system justification theory argue that (a) there is a general ideological motive to justify the existing social order, (b) this motive is at… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Ethos of Conflict: A System Justification Perspective

For several decades, the work of Daniel Bar-Tal has illuminated the means by which belief systems are socially constructed and shared widely within societies. His work has offered pivotal insights

A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications

  • J. Jost
  • Psychology
    British Journal of Social Psychology
  • 2018
A theory of system justification was proposed 25 years ago by Jost and Banaji (1994, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 33, 1) in the British Journal of Social Psychology to explain ‘the participation by

System Justification Among the Disadvantaged: A Triadic Social Stratification Perspective

For the past 25 years, the field of social and political psychology has embraced the idea that humans possess a special system justification motivation which causes even members of disadvantaged

A critical review of the (un)conscious basis for system-supporting attitudes of the disadvantaged

Is support for societal systems amongst the disadvantaged driven by an (un)conscious system justification motive that is independent from self-interests? System justification theory (SJT) is unique

Shared Reality, System Justification, and the Relational Basis of Ideological Beliefs

Although it is tempting to think that one’s political convictions reflect independent and unbiased thinking, research increasingly suggests that ideologies reflect motivational processes. The present

System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future

TLDR
Future research is called on to further utilize nationally representative and multi-level data, investigate the relational motives behind system justification, address social change from a system justification perspective, and extend system justification theory's focus beyond WEIRD societies.

The System Justification Conundrum: Re-Examining the Cognitive Dissonance Basis for System Justification

TLDR
Key cognitive dissonance assumptions for SJT 's central proposition that support for unequal systems should be higher among members of disadvantaged groups than amongMembers of advantaged groups when personal and group interests are weak are re-examine.

Advancing a Social Identity Model of System Attitudes

Abstract The connection between social identity and attitudes toward the criminal justice system (CJS) is an area of interest among criminologists and legitimacy scholars. Previous work has proposed

When women support the status quo: Gender moderates the relationship between openness to experience and system-justifying beliefs

Although epistemic needs motivate the endorsement of system-justifying beliefs, few studies have investigated moderators of this association. Here, we argue that because being the target of

System Justification Theory

System justification is a social psychology term of art that designates any motivational tendency to defend, bolster, or rationalize existing social, economic, and political arrangements. It is
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 182 REFERENCES

The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology

In this chapter, we trace the historical and intellectual origins of system justification theory, summarise the basic assumptions of the theory, and derive 18 specific hypotheses from a system

Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged

According to system justification theory, people are motivated to preserve the belief that existing social arrangements are fair, legitimate, and justifiable (Jost & Banaji, 1994). The strongest form

The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness

Although the concept of justification has played a significant role in many social psychological theories, its presence in recent examinations of stereotyping has been minimal. We describe and

The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes

Resistant versus Acquiescent Responses to Ingroup Inferiority as a Function of Social Dominance Orientation in the USA and Italy

Social identity theory typically emphasizes how low status group members resist and challenge imputations of inferiority (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), whereas system justification theory emphasizes the

Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges

This article presents a critical review of Social Identity Theory. Its major contributions to the study of intergroup relations are discussed, focusing on its powerful explanations of such phenomena

Non-conscious Forms of System Justification: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Preferences for Higher Status Groups

According to system justification theory, which complement theories of similarity, social identification, and homophily, people internalize and perpetuate systemic forms of inequality, event if it

Contexts of System Justification and System Evaluation: Exploring the Social Comparison Strategies of the (Not Yet) Contented Female Worker

Those who are historic targets of discrimination seem surprisingly likely to accept their situation, a phenomenon Jost and Banaji (1994) call system justification. One assumption in system
...