A Critique of Wolfhart Pannenberg's Scientific Theology

@article{Alvarez2013ACO,
  title={A Critique of Wolfhart Pannenberg's Scientific Theology},
  author={Daniel R. Alvarez},
  journal={Theology and Science},
  year={2013},
  volume={11},
  pages={224 - 250}
}
Abstract In Theology and the Philosophy of Science, Wolfhart Pannenberg argues that theology is on a par with the natural sciences, insofar as theological statements are hypotheses subject to confirmation or disconfirmation by experience. He defends his thesis by claiming that theology makes truth-claims about reality; and, second, that these are verifiable in the same sense that scientific statements are. I will argue that this thesis is wrong; and that the first claim could be right in a… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES

The two dogmas of empiricism

Modern empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters of

Although I have charged P. in the foregoing with not stating clearly or sufficiently the conditions by which Christianity and its God would be verified

    130), where he 246 Theology and Science insists that we must recognize "the historical nature of the biblical writings and the relation of the concepts we find in them to those dominant at the time

    • Systematic Theology

    463; and 421, 422, in connection with Christ's expiatory death, where P. writes

    • Cf. Systematic Theology

    332, emphasis mine. Cf. also 314, 315, 299, and 300; and Systematic Theology

    • TAPOS

    There is a God," where "God" is not a proper name but a definite description of an object which may or may not exist; and the status of "there is" as a second-level predicate is respected, as Russell

    • Existence, as we learned from Kant (and as reiterated, with greater authority, by Frege)
    • 1956

    TAPOS, 336, emphasis mine

    • Systematic Theology